| Index
Prager KABC Radio Highlights
Send Luke Ford Mail
Dennis Prager's Biography
Prager on Homosexuality
Disclaimer
Tell How Dennis Prager Changed
Your Life
Essays on Prager
Prager Update 1-98
Dennis
Prager Links
Why Be Good
Why Not Be Good
Defining Good
Obstacles to Goodness
How to be Good
Disclaimer
Jewish
Music
Prager's Official Web Site
|
Think a Second Time
By Dennis Prager
ReganBooks/HarperCollins
Catalog Price: $13.00
I have written "Think a Second Time" because most people don't
think a second time. Most of us form opinions about life's great
issues at a young age and retain them forever. The reasons are not
hard to discern: It isn't comfortable to think through every issue;
serious thought is as strenuous as serious exercise, and as we age,
most of us become preoccupied with other matters. Family and livelihood
problems alone can take up all of one's attention, and if they don't,
there is always television or sports or hobbies or some other diversion.
This is sad, because unclear thinking is a major source of social
and personal problems.
Take, for example, the question of whether human nature is basically
good. Differing views on this question alone explain much of the
liberal-conservative divide in our society. If you think people
are basically good, you probably blame socioeconomic conditions
for the evil people do (generally the liberal position); if you
think that evil comes from within people's nature, you are more
likely to blame people for the evil they do (generally the conservative
position).
Your views on this issue can even profoundly affect your own happiness.
Those who believe that people are basically good may have set themselves
up for repeated disappointment in people, while those who have a
more sober view of human nature (neither basically good nor evil)
will, instead, celebrate their good fortune every time they meet
a good person. In Chapter 1, I discuss why the belief that people
are basically good is wrong.
Who am I that you should want to read my thoughts on forty-three
subjects?
It is hardly an author's place to sell himself to a prospective
reader-his writings have to earn your respect and attention. But
since you have either already purchased (or been given) this book,
or are reading this at a bookstore, I'd like to briefly introduce
myself.
I am a highly passionate moderate. In fact, I am so passionate
and so moderate that I am even passionate about being moderate.
I love life and goodness, and I hate cruelty. I want to hug every
kind person and to inflict hurt on bad people (I believe in just
revenge). I am religious and believe in God, but I readily acknowledge
how much harm religious people have done, and I have a tough time
praying to Him.
What makes me tick is a desire to see good conquer evil, as corny
as this may sound. I have been preoccupied with good and evil ever
since, as a child, I saw kids bully other kids. This preoccupation
permeates every chapter of this book.
I have always believed that if offered a choice between clarity
and happiness, I would choose clarity (though I have come to believe
that clarity in fact enhances happiness). These essays represent
my yearning for clarity. Very different versions of some of these
essays were published m my quarterly journal, "Ultimate Issues",
others in the "Wall Street Journal" and the "Los Angeles Times".
A word, therefore, about my journal. I began writing "Ultimate Issues"
to stay in touch with people who attended my lectures (after three
thousand lectures, that's a lot of people). Speeches are like one-night
stands-pleasurable and intense at night, but you never see each
other again. By my fifteenth year of lecturing, I was looking for
a long-term relationship. In 1985, I decided to write and publish
a personal quarterly journal. Since then, through a divorce and
remarriage, three children, changes in my professional life, and
personal crises, I have published this journal every quarter, save
two. My readers have followed my life and my thinking on everything
from God's existence to having a national television show to male
sexual nature. This is, therefore, not only a book of thoroughly
revised essays, but the culmination of ten years of writing on these
subjects.
I would be very pleased if every reader of this book agreed with
every word in it, but if thirteen years as a talk radio host are
any indication, few readers will always agree with me, and few will
always disagree. Many liberals, for example, will probably love
my chapter on how religion can lead to cruelty but be annoyed with
my essay on how liberalism can lead to cruelty ("Blacks, Liberals,
and the Los Angeles Riots"). Religious readers will love my vigorous
defense of God- and religion-based ethics but probably be troubled
by my defense of men who attend a striptease show. But my primary-
goal is not agreement; it is to provoke the reader to think a second
time.
|