To the Editor: I weigh in on the side of ''co-management'' between an
optometrist and eye surgeon as discussed in ''Laser Eye Surgery's Turf
War.'' I first discussed Lasik with my optometrist of 12 years several
months ago. It made perfect sense to start this dialogue with someone
familiar with my vision history. One criterion in assessing a Lasik candidate
is nondeteriorating vision for a couple of years before the procedure.
Who would know better than my optometrist? In response to my inquiry,
my optometrist gave me an objective and complete discussion of Lasik:
pros, cons, risks, side effects, expectations. I was shown a video further
explaining the procedure. I was not subjected to a hard sell. I was told
of his alliance with an ophthalmologist but was also encouraged to shop
around. I had the surgery six weeks ago and am satisfied with the results
and my treatment before and after. My optometrist performed all pre- and
post-operative care, and I met the surgeon only the afternoon of the procedure.
But I was fully briefed before, during and after, and I was offered complete
access to the ophthalmologist if necessary. I'll trust that arrangement
over billboards and radio ads every time. Now, where did I put those blasted
reading glasses . . .