|
What Was That?
From the LukeFordFanBlog:
We were expecting one hour of spiritual enlightenment; instead, we
got 30 minutes of appalling, albeit strangely compelling, filth.
Luke Ford Fan Blog headquarters is still trying to make sense of what
we saw and heard last night.
Ultimately though we blame ourselves. The Internet has ruined us. Our
attention span is shot. In truth, we really only glanced at the content
on LukeFord.net. We can no longer concentrate our minds for more than
a few moments at a time, before being compelled to click our mice and
go on to another website. We frantically go from ESPN to check (non-football)
sports scores, to the Drudge Report, to Yahoo! weather, to eBay (to
buy other people's crap) to various political blogs and websites, and
back to ESPN again. Really, it's just click, click, click, click, click,
click, click. We can no longer absorb any information. Our obsession
with Mr Ford came after ten years of following Rush Limbaugh, until
we found out that he was a hillbilly heroin junky six weeks ago. This
whole affair reminds us of our terrible disappointment back in 1988
when we found out that Jimmy Swaggart was banging hookers. There's probably
a lesson somewhere in all of this for us, but we're far too stupid to
figure it out.
The Mullah Onan writes:
The Mullah Onan viewed 60 Minutes tonight (11/23/03) with a somewhat
jaded interest. The lead story on the main-streaming of porn throught
the quiet involvement of the big corporations was great to see in prime
time. As an aside, after hearing that the average playing time of a
porno on hotel TV's is 6 minutes, the Imam of Indecency will be taking
to the circuit to give classes in Tantric voyeurism. For the $20 most
hotels charge for a third-rate porno, one should at least be able to
stretch things out to an hour. (Better yet call the concierge and obtain
the services of a live infidel pomegranate blossom, but that's a whole
other issue.) The Imam of Indecency invites business travelers to check
back soon for seminar locations and tuition info.
60 Minutes made the point that by siccing the ice-blooded shrew of
Pittsburgh, Mary "Death"Buchanan on little guy Rob Black while not going
after AT&T and Marriot, Ashcroft is a hypocrite and a coward. The MO
wishes 60 Minutes had also made more of an issue of the Coward General
dragging Rob Black across the country to be tried by a jury of hand
picked blue-nosed yokels. The MO puts down the Koran momentarily to
see that Declaration of Independence indicted King George for dragging
his victims to trial in courts far away. This is why the Bill of Rights
- which Ashcroft holds in contempt - guarantees a right to trial where
the alleged crime was committed. (Yes, Virginia, they have federal courts
on Kaliforneya, the locus coitus of any "crime" committed by Black.)
But we are about having fun here, and this is becoming too serious.
What really irked th MO was the lack of any input from the spiritual
community. We have clergy of all denominations here, and any of our
spiritual leaders could have said a benediction for 60 Minutes. Instead,
we had the crypto-Zionist Luke Ford (the real one) popping up and claiming
that anyone over 35 is scandalized by porn. Harrumph. Had Mike or Morley
asked the messenger of Allah, for example, they would have learned that
the public exhibition of lewdness brings inner peace to adults of all
ages. Even with this flaw, however, the Sheikh of Smut congratulates
60 Minutes on a well-done piece. Allah Akvar, the Mullah Onan
Dave Cummings, a 65 year old adult star, writes:
Luke Ford used subjectively biased generalizations in some of his comments
last night on the 60 Minutes show (e.g., his comments about porn being
more acceptable lately for 18-25 year olds but that people his age of
37 and up find it shameful; that most girls do only one filming and
quit because they find it so painful, horrifying, embarrassing, and
humiliating for them that they never do it again; and, something about
that if a pornographer slept in one's home, the owner would want to
burn the sheets the next morning)----I'm appalled that any entity or
person continues to read or considers Ford a "legitimate" news source,
instead of seeing him as someone with significant personal appraisals
that slant many of his comments. In my view, he is and has been a HUGE
negative against the Adult Film Industry and the Adult Internet business.
GT writes:
I disagree. I think Luke Ford does the industry a service by keeping
the more sleazy aspects of it in line, and he does so without having
to resort to the; "...this is just plain obscene and therefore it should
be banned..." antics of Ashcroft, Mary Buchanan & Co.
If it hadn't been for Luke Ford, the AIDS outbreak a few years back
would have been covered up and just swept under the carpet. It would
have been a forgotten footnote somewhere that the industry would just
as soon forget.
So do you all really think I would just trust the AVN to police itself?
No way..... I don't trust any trade organizations out there and that
includes the AVN, the MPAA or the RIAA, etc... They're only looking
out for themselves and their own pocketbooks, plain and simple.
I think the industry need an independent, if somewhat biased source,
away from the religious fanatics and the right-wing zealots who know
they can't possibly put porn back into the closet where it used to be.
That's why we need more Luke Fords to expose the industry's 'dirty
little secrets' to some of the fans that are out there. Then maybe
some of these producers like Max Hardcore and Rob Black will shape up
without having the government getting involved.
Jeff writes:
Who would you put in his place? Luke is attractive, Australian, and
cynical... and he rolls it all into sound bites. Who does the industry
have that can do that?
I read an article the other day about some bankruptcy lawyer who has
a decent sideline by being *the* bankruptcy lawyer reporters come to
for quotes, interviews, on-camera panels, etc... basically, the upshot
is he's no great lawyer, but he knows his stuff and can boil it down
to a factoid or soundbite length; and he works hard at making media
contacts.
So, if you want some more pro-industry talking heads, go create them!
Have Fayner drop the bong for a few minutes, take a nap, comb his hair
and let him be your guy (Just kidding, Scott!). Or Wankus. Or whomever.
Have someone else be the "go-to guy" for Steve Krofts and the rest of
the mainstream media... as it is, there *is* no one else, it seems,
other than Luke to turn to for history, perspective, etc.
But it seems to me that Luke is the one hustling to be seen and heard;
these journalists just don't call him out of the blue; he's made himself
available to them. There's nothing wrong with being a media whore, as
long as at the end of the day, the whore is sleeping with you.
29Palms writes:
Was it just me or did Luke Ford try to come off as someone who dislikes
porn? But if you read his writings on his website he goes to every sex
party in the biz in "Hollyweird," does drugs with the stars, binge drinks
and no telling what else he's up to. I mean for someone who pretended
to come off as not a fan... he sure is heavily involved finding out
who's doin what and where to score drugs every evening. Luke was dressed
in a nice sports jacket and tie and made out that he's totally "clean"
and not one of those "filthy unwashed and uneducated rednecks" who watch
this kind of stuff (adult films) Anybody else get this impression?
Brian writes:
He's been lurking through the industry...on his seemingly innocent
charms but people should know, Ford does NOT support the adult industry,
he views talent as scum and aside from many racially motivated innuendos,
uses his Jewish faith to judge people. CBS used Luke as a spokesperson
for porn and he severely misrepresented. It's like President Bush asking
Bill Clinton to speak on his behalf.
Mutt writes:
Luke is entertaining and thought provoking and of course also irresponsible
sometimes. Dave you seem like a class act, I read and post to RAME occassionally
- I also think you are a bit of a Pollyanna in the porn biz and want
to believe it's a big happy bunch of great people. Luke being an outsider
serves a purpose, he doesn't care if porners hate him or threaten to
hurt him. Luke broke the story on Marc Wallice AKA 'DickODeath' being
allowed to work with HIV potentially infecting and killing god knows
how many young girls. Where was AVN on that one?
Where is the AVN or Dave Cummings story on how many girls enter the
porn industry and leave immediately after their first shoot never to
work again - not because they had second thoughts or guilt but because
they were physically WRECKED by somebody, their vaginas or asses torn
up or they freaked out when they caught an STD on their very first shoot?
I know you treat girls with respect and everything but it is a nasty
business. Luke serves a purpose.
KB writes: "Luke has NEVER called himself a supporter of the adult
biz - he is the hemmorhoid of the adult industry. 60 Minutes...solicited
Luke for this story because he is porn's Anti-Christ."
Cathy's Seipp's UPI Column On Moi
Cathy
Seipp writes on UPI.com (an excerpt below):
I am that "friend of Ford's." And as such -- as well as a longtime
media watcher -- I'd say that Luke does need to be more careful with
his block-quote indentations, among other things.
But as I told Shafer -- who called to make sure he was not being "pranked"
(very sensible in this post-Stephen Glass/Jayson Blair era) -- Luke
is usually quite accurate, all things considered, except for the spelling
bloopers.
In a way, he's more accurate than many stuffy proper journos, as at
least he admits mistakes and corrects them immediately.
Also, he doesn't worry about offending people, which I think is an
underacknowledged impediment to journalistic honesty.
The New York Times plagiarizing Luke Ford created a definite media
buzz. "Unbelievable," former Los Angeles Times staffer Kevin Roderick,
who runs the L.A. media site LAObserved.com, told me. "Your pal is Zelig."
As it happens, I served as an unpaid fact-checker for the Slate story.
Shafer called me again to look up the Connelly citation in the "Dish"
bibliography and check that the hardcover publication date was indeed
2000.
Lucky for all concerned, I have a well-organized office with alphabetized
books. But you know, anything to help out a scrappy, seat-of-the-pants
operation like Microsoft.
Anyway, as Shafer asked rhetorically about Luke Ford in his piece:
"Who is he?"
[H]he's a Seventh Day Adventist minister's son, originally from Australia,
who was raised to be a Christian missionary but converted to Orthodox
Judaism a dozen years ago.
He worked as a sports and news writer for a few Northern California
papers and radio stations, then moved to Los Angeles in 1994. After
failing to make it here as an actor, he began a porn gossip site, Lukeford.com.
Once an angry subject drove Luke to East L.A., kicked him out of the
car, bashed his head against a lamp post a few times, and drove off.
That didn't deter his porn muckraking.
But being ejected from four Orthodox synagogues did, so he sold Lukeford.com
two years ago. (A fifth has since accepted him.)
Luke always looks handsome and neatly dressed, often in a stylish
black suit. But he sleeps on the floor of a 200-square-foot garage apartment
and drives an old van so battered most serial killers and dogcatchers
would turn up their noses at it.
Although, as he boasted loudly enough for several people to turn their
heads as we walked down the street the other day, "Yeah, baby, I got
windshield wipers and turn signals now!"
His current site, Lukeford.net, revolves not around porn but his many
other obsessions: seedy Hollywood characters like Anthony Pellicano;
Judaism; his own romantic misadventures (at 37, he has not yet found
an Orthodox Jewish bride to bear the 12 children he wants); the Dallas
Cowboys; radio talk show host Dennis Prager; media circuses of the moment
like the Kobe Bryant rape trial; Hollywood producers; people who write
about Hollywood producers; female journalists; and media junkies of
all stripes.
It's the convergence of these last two categories that created a special
place for me on Lukeford.net's "Hall of Fame for Female Journos" page
-- as well as the beginning of a beautiful friendship that is also regularly
exasperating.
And he doesn't let any of this prevent him from assuming a constant
Elmer Gantryish tone of moral superiority.
He dresses me down regularly on his blog for transgressions like wearing
sleeveless dresses or temporary tattoos, which he once said made me
look like a Hittite priestess on her way to an orgy.
When I once pointed out he really can't have it both ways, he snapped:
"I can have it as many ways as I like. ... I'm Luke Ford, your moral
leader, and live in a drug-induced fantasy world of unparalleled hypocrisy."
Luke Ford Watching Himself on "60 Minutes"
Cathy Seipp
writes on her blog (including an amusing picture of me):
Actually this picture shows him in my living room last week watching
the Dallas Cowboys lose to the New England Patriots -- thus the appalled
expression, despite the elderly pussycat companion -- but since that's
how he looks watching TV it's a close enough illustration.
Meanwhile, in a reversal of our usual situation, I played Boswell to
Luke's Dr. Johnson in this just-published UPI piece in the wake of the
New York Times plagiarizing him last week. An excerpt:
Seipp: So, Sir, are you satisfied with how the Times admitted its
error?
Ford: Ma'am, the New York Times humbling itself to bloggers is like
a dog's walking on his hinder legs. It is not well; but you are surprised
to see it done at all.
Actually, the Times apologized quickly and well, and the above is not
really an excerpt, but what the hell. Luke looked and sounded good on
"60 Minutes." As did the hovel for some reason. Amazing what they can
do with lighting these days! Cecile was upset they didn't show more
of him and less of the other interviewees -- "He's much better looking
than those other guys!" -- but all in all, a pretty good show.
Marcus Wolf writes Cathy: "How can you discuss Luke Ford without
also extolling the primary moral guides in his life?"
Nancy writes: "Luke looks like someone's uncle Giuseppe in this
photo."
Skippy McButter writes Cathy:
If that really is Luke, all I can say is, what happened? The Luke I
last met was so much svelter and more youthful looking. He almost looked
like someone Michael Jackson might have wanted to know better a few
decades back. Father time comes for us all, I suppose. (He certainly
did for Skippy McButter, Republican.) Here in the West Village on Christopher
Street (where we all nervously await the end of Ramadan - which this
year happens to fall on Thanksgiving), people put a premium on youthful
good looks, and sorry to say this, but Luke seems to have let himself
slip. Also, what is he doing watching a football game wearing THOSE
clothes, being topped by a male cat? Most certainly not the photograph
he will want to use in the future for JDate.
Cathy replies: "That's a lady cat! The lovely and elegant Felice,
who I met 16 years ago when she was giving birth to a litter of kittens
on a pederast's lawn."
Cecile du Bois
writes on her blog:
I happily watched Luke Ford our moral leader on Sixty Minutes. He was
the high point of the down-sliding mudslide. Luke had his charming devoted
Australian accent along with his religiously worn tuxedo. Although he
claimed to have a cold, he looked fine in Mom and my opinion. One thing
I don't get though is that he always has watery eyes. Is it because
he always has those Emo-Air Supply songs running through his head causing
him to get emotional even when he's not? Or is it because he has naturally
intense eyes?
Jimmy writes:
Ford looked like a minimum-wage-earning loser who tried hard to clean
up his act and appearance for his national moment, but didn’t quite
succeed at doing so. Luke threw out his biased opinions as if they were
fact. When Luke claimed that most girls come into this business and
end up only performing in one scene because they are so horrified and
feel so degraded after the experience, I expected 60 Minutes to provide
some kind of proof that this allegation had some truth to it. But they
did not.
Moose writes: "Thing that struck me the most was what a snob & creep
Luke Ford is...To paraphrase him: "It's not like the people trying out
for adult films would go to medical or law school anyway"....He basically
insinuated that porn stars are losers blah, blah, blah..."
Justin writes: "Could Luke Ford get into law or medical school?"
Luke says: "No. I do not have my BA."
Rick writes: "I thought Luke Ford was trying too hard to look legit
and business like dressed in a suit and acting like he's above it all
like you say. The guy makes his living off industry gossip. Who does he
think he is all of a sudden."
Sandy writes: "Saw Luke on 60 Minutes. He looked strong and fit,
handsome. Very articulate. I missed intro of him, something about he has
a talk show. Does he still? He seemed to be panning the porn industry
even as he knows all about it. Said most women only participate once and
then no more, it's so demeaning, degrading, humiliting, etc. What is Luke
doing these days?"
Amalek
Speaks To 60 Minutes
The more I think about that piece on porn 60 Minutes ran last night,
the more mediocre I think it was, especially for the time they spent
on it. The first half was promising enough, and seemed meant to set
up the proposition that porn is just an ordinary part of commerce, the
same as provisioning hotels with bars of soap or selling fashion magazines
to women. I expected the second half of the report to be a tightly argued
rebuttal of that proposition, but it was not. Instead what we got was
some pecksniff type (A Mr. Lane), and a few others arguing that the
stuff was immoral and spreading like toxic mold. Yeah, brief mention
was made of some especially nasty violent porn, but not enough for viewers
to conclude that it was fundamentally any different than say, a slasher
film with some more flesh thrown in.
Then there was your bit. I'm sure you must have had lots more to say
than what they used, but all we got to hear you saying was that porners
are nasty people ("you'd want to burn the sheets") without any facts
to back that up, and that the experience of making porn was often unpleasant
(again without the sort of factual detail that wins arguments). I wish
Kroft had spent more air time with you developing these themes instead
of using sound bites from lawyers and lobbyists. Someone should have
been permitted to make the argument, with hard facts, that the production
of porn subjects the workers on whose backs it is made to substantial
physical and psychological risks for crummy money. Someone should have
been permitted to make the argument, with hard facts, that the infiltration
of the porn ethos into the musical acts that young girls listen to is
not good for their moral development or for America. But these sorts
of arguments were not developed by 60 Minutes. Instead we were left
with the images of prosperous operators in Las Vegas and huge corporations,
all giving porn their blessing.
Still, you did come off good in that piece. A bit heavier than I remember
you being, but still well turned out. Successful looking, even. Nothing
your ..... (who so coldly cast you out from his shul) could object to,
not that he would ever tolerate someone like you.
Luke, the only way you will be able to develop these themes more fully
is to get your own television show on one of the cable channels (NOT
the Playboy channel - I'm thinking Spike TV or E!). You know this. So
what are you doing to advance yourself to that end?
You really need to buy back that domain name. Your name will be mud
for so long as lukeford.com (nobody will think to try .net) pulls up
porn.
Marc writes: "I concur, the dot-com thing is an albatross--just
looked on there for the first time in a year or two ... am i getting more
squeamish, or are the pics getting filthier? but ... LF.net today is as
close to reading like the "old days" for the first time in a very long
time. I think it's time for our moral leader to fully re-cast himself
as a blogger who works around the clock churning out material on ... something?
if not now, then when? stop dithering and do it."
Khunrum writes: "It is already too late for a second act (unless
you change your name to Morry Lipshitz and become a mail carrier). My
suggestion is to go into the landscaping business. You're already halfway
there with the van. All you need now is a couple of lawnmowers, some rakes
and a few Mexicans. I'd call it, "Let Us Blow Your Leaves." Maybe hire
some chicks to rake leaves. I think it will fly."
Janey writes:
I'm very proud of you. It's strange, but I am. Every triumph for you
gives me a disturbingly warm feeling. It's almost as if I think you're
a lovely guy who deserves all the happiness in the world or something.
Yuck!
I just wish I could have seen it for myself, but thanks for posting
the screen grabs and transcript. Someday I'll tell my grandchildren
that I used to correspond with Luke Ford.
"THE Luke Ford, Grandmama? The ---- reporter?"
"Yes, child."
"Grandmama rules!"
Partial
transcript of 60 Minutes Show
Pic1 Pic2
Pic3 Luke
walking with Steve Kroft Luke,
Steve Luke, Steve Luke
Luke, Steve Luke
Luke Ford, who spent seven years writing an Internet gossip column about
the adult entertainment industry for his own his own Internet Web site,
isn't sure what to make of it. “It's become popular, cool, acceptable
in this 18-to-25 age group. My age group, I'm 37, my age group and up.
We think porn is something that's shameful. But for kids half my age,
they think it's cool,” says Ford, who guesses it’s an act of rebellion,
embracing one of society’s last taboos.
Ford, who is often referred to as the Matt Drudge of porn, gave 60 Minutes
a tour of a backyard porn set in a residential neighborhood of Chatsworth
that has been used by porn directors for more than 20 years.
“It is just like Hollywood,” he says.
Like the porn industry itself, it becomes less glamorous the closer you
get. If you take away the accountants and CEOs, you’re left with a small
insular world, filled with renegades and outcasts, who like to flaunt
society's rules.
“They come into this industry, because this is the single easiest way
that they can earn $1,000 in a day, in two hours,” says Ford. “It's not
like we're losing people from going to medical school or business school
or becoming lawyers.”
“Most girls who enter this industry do one video and quit. The experience
is so painful, horrifying, embarrassing, humiliating for them that they
never do it again,” says Ford.
........................................
Praise God, I don't believe I did anything on 60 Minutes that should
get me thrown out of any more synagogues.
I was happy with it. You never know which soundbites they are going to
use. When I was walking around that backyard, I had nothing to say and
just improvised some pop culture silliness. I would've bet 60 Minutes
(and VH1 last month) would've used some of my more fire-breathing lines.
It would be cool to appear cool about all this, but I feel like I tasted
eternity. I have transcended death. If I die tomorrow, I will always be
there on tape. I've gotten to have my say. I've lived. There's proof,
right on your TV. Now I get to hear from people who haven't been around
for years. It's a shout-out to the thousands of people who've passed through
my life.
I thought the 60 Minutes piece were dull but fair. I didn't learn anything.
I thought they were way too gullible about the numbers the industry claimed
for itself.
From the book, The Writer's Journey (and forgive me for trying
to use some of the patterns in the book for my memoir):
This ability to overcome the forces of death is the real Elixir most
heroes seek.
Heroes emerge from their Ordeals to be recognized as special and different,
part of a select few who have outwitted death.
Heroes may find that surviving death grants new powers or better perceptions.
A hero may be granted a new insight or understanding of a mystery as
her Reward. She may see through a deception. If she has been dealing
with a shapeshifting partner, she may see through his disguises and
perceive the reality for the first time. Seizing the Sword can be a
moment of clarity.
The phone calls started coming in at 5:14PM California time, as soon
as the pieces finish airing on the East Coast.
A movie producer I interviewed almost two years ago calls me: "A
two-parter. That's rare. You looked good. You were on a lot. They didn't
cut you out. You were wearing a [black] suit. This should help you sell
your books. You're featured as an expert. You made a little history tonight.
I'm proud of you."
Mike phones from Atlanta: "I just saw you on TV a little while ago.
You didn't look too bad but I was in Hooters and I couldn't hear a word
you said. You looked like those old pictures of you. You were wearing
a coat and tie and you had that dishevelled reporter look going on. So
people who don't really know you, you look respectable. If it was me,
I'd be recording it and [engaging in an act of self-debasement]. I know
how it is when you have an ego."
Luke: "I'm just sorry that I don't have someone special to celebrate
it with. I will watch it alone."
Mike: "If you weren't so picky, you'd have a house full of them.
You're a nice looking guy. You need to learn some manners but you'll be
all right. You've got this Jewish girl fetish going on. You don't want
anything to do with ---- girls. They're not good enough. You want a girl
over there. A bird in the hand is better than two in the bush [or shul].
You should keep a few ---- friends for when you want companionship while
you search for that long lost soulmate. And soon you'll find out, there's
no such thing. So you'll start appreciating your friends more. That's
how it works with me.
"I just like you because you're offbeat like me. I like anyone who
speaks his mind, no matter how bizarre he is."
Chaim Amalek writes:
Mike is right, but he is also wrong. He is right in that of course
you should avail yourself of whatever social opportunities you may have
at hand which, in your case, are considerable. I mean, most of your
(male) readers would gladly sin for the chance to indulge in what you
could be doing if you wanted to. On the other hand he is wrong, because
in doing so, you would find yourself becoming less satisfied with Jewish
women of the sort you say you want to marry, and thus be less likely
to marry one of them. Of course, at the moment you have neither of either
(Jewish women of suitable breeding stock, nor other women of questionable
morals), so perhaps you should just declare a personal holiday from
Torah and have some fun. It would be the Christian thing to do.
Amy
Alkon writes: "Articulate and handsome on 60 Minutes. I raced
home just to watch you -- and was very happy that they put your seg on
first. Very nice choice of wardrobe. I was surprised to see your work
environment, since the way you'd characterized it, I thought your apartment/"hovel"
was something just this side of a cardboard refrigerator box!"
JMT writes: "Is Brylcreem coming back?"
Yitzhok says: "Fred Lane comes off much cleaner than you."
Heather MacDonald writes: "Darling, you were gorgeous. The only
classy guy in the whole joint!"
Bruce writes: "Was that you making
your national TV debut? You looked so ruggedly handsome, you almost
fooled me."
WWW says: "Compared the the usual schnooks they filmed at the AVN
trade show, I think you looked ok."
Rob writes: "Sadly most 60 Minutes viewers will accidentally go
to lukeford.COM and be repulsed. Few will stumble upon lukeford.NET, the
home of Our Moral Leader."
Fred writes: "I thought you came off better than Rob Black."
My mom writes: "I read the tributes. You have loads of friends.
You must be pleased."
Sandy writes: "I thought you looked great, sounded professional,
and made your case. Good for you!
"Now for a joke: How do you know when you've arrived at Neverland?
When the big hand is on the small hand."
Peter writes:
You claimed that you were merely reporting on that world. Which is
like saying that you are writing about filth--yet remaining untouched
while neck deep in a sewer. You ramble on about how much respect Sanchez
and the FBI had for your site. I understand that it's a human impulse--to
justify one's actions. But it's clear...that your immersion in that
world was not that of a simple journalist, but of a man deeply attracted
to the degradation. It was a bit too Christian. By which I mean the
Christian impulse to "save sinners." The Victorian Minister wandering
the streets of London, seeking fallen women to save, yet in truth, overwhelmed
with desire for these creatures.
I think you have matured greatly. There is still the bad-boy impulse
at work, but it's channeled in much healthier directions. To write about
the world of journalists is a worthy subject. My only fear is that because
you are so needy, so desperate for acceptance, that you will not write
truthfully. I mean they have, to some extent, let you into the club.
And now that you're in the club, are you going to risk excommunication
by revealing what they don't want revealed? I empathize.
Timmy writes:
1) First think I noticed: you have an odd but charming Australian accent.
Are you conscious of it? Do you try and retain it? Usually, when youths
from English speaking countries come to America they assume our American
accent. Not so in your case?
2) That point about 1,000 per day needs elaboration and clarification.
All porn performers can earn 1,000 per day? And if they do earn 1000
in a day, how many days must they wait untill they get another pay day?
1, 10, 20,60 ...... Is it really that lucrative for the grunts of the
industry?
3) I can't recall the number mentioned, but are there really "billions
" being EARNED by the industry. Somehow I don't buy that. These figures
are repeated constantly but I have never seen anything close to verification.
You FORGOT to mention and talk about the peculiar fact that porn in
America is largely produced, directed, and controlled by ONE significant
ethnic group.
Luke answers: "I've made no effort with my accent. I came here when
I was eleven. Aussies think I sound like a Yank. About the $$$, your skepticism
is warranted. I'd say porn is perhaps a $3 billion a year industry, less
than college textbooks. Not the $10 billion figure thrown around by 60
Minutes and The New York Times."
Cecile du Bois
writes:
Question: Are you going to watch yourself on 60 minutes for fun? Why
are you depriving yourelf of fun on your blog? Blog=Vain fun, your room,
your space where you're lucky to get readers who care. Six weeks without
attempting attention seems as, in my opinion, as hard as bungee jumping
or worse. The Ten Commandments does not include: "Luke Ford shall not
attract attention in his blog", now does it? Unless you're rewriting
your version of the Torah enlabeled, "The True Fordian Bible by Your
Moral Leader," I don't see why you should starve yourself. Unless it
is in some hidden religion of yours... "In the summer you're a nudist,
in the winter you're a [peaceful] Buddhist."
JackieD writes Cecile:
"I believe in my moral leader, and will put my money where my mouth
is. Cecile, I bet you one silver dollar that Luke will not use his blog
to get attention for himself until the New Year."
Hebcal writes Cecile:
"Considering it's not even Kislev yet, Luke has 10+ months to go.
He's lucky that's it's not a leap year, otherwise it's be 11."
A friend from shul tells Luke AKA Levi: "You looked terrific. We
were all watching. Shuvua Tov and I'll see you on Shabbos."
Author David Rensin writes: "You clean up well. Congrats."
Greg writes: "Did
you note that Kroft repeated the canard that John Ashcrost covered the
bare breasts of the justice statue because of his prudishness?"
Jack says: "You give a great soundbyte. It was very authoritative
and definitive. It wasn't like you were mincing any words. I'm shocked
that Steve Hirsch and Christian Mann didn't get any face time. You had
a lot. It's funny that Bill Lyon got so much time and he's no longer with
the Free Speech Coalition. I've never seen them do a two-parter. I know
how slanted you can get. I know where you took these guys. And they didn't
slant it."
Jack turns to his girl friend: "Yeah, I'm talking to the guy with
the sexy accent. It's my friend Lyra."
Luke: "How do you spell her name?"
Jack: "Why? Are you going to put it in your column?"
Luke: "No."
Jack: "Then why are you asking me how to spell her name?"
Luke: "I'm just curious."
Jack: "You're such a knucklehead. L-y-r-a. You'd go crazy over her."
Jack turns to Lyra: "He don't like Italians. He's Jewish."
Luke: "Is she an Orthodox Jew?"
Lyra: "I'll be Orthodox for him."
From Luke
Ford Fan Blog:
Go Away
We recently received the following letter from a prospective Luke Ford PA
contest applicant from Norway.
Hello, my name is Ingrid Lebowitz. Let me tell you something
about myself before I explain my predicament.
I'm Norwegian. I attend the University of Tromso where I'm majoring in
Hebraic Studies. I'm 5'10" and 110 lbs. My measurements are 39-21-34.
I'm a 19 year old virgin. I have long, flowing flaxen hair, milky white
skin, and beautiful blue eyes.
Here are some of my likes: Torah study; listening attentively to my man;
doing what my man asks me to do, when he asks me to do it; respecting
my man's need for quiet time alone; always being supportive of my man
with words of encouragement when he is feeling sad; watching sports on
television with my man; cooking; cleaning; making babies.
And here are some of my dislikes: talking to my man about my feelings;
reading non-religious books; wicca; marxist feminism; socialist feminism;
liberal feminism; libertarian feminism; conservative feminism; neoconservative
feminism; neolibertarian feminism; neoliberal feminism; neosocialist feminism;
neomarxist feminism; voting.
I was so excited to hear about your contest. I desperately want to meet
Mr Ford. I adore everything about him: his mind, his body and his soul.
Unfortunately being a poor university student I'm having trouble coming
up with the required funds to make it to Mr Ford's office in LA, if I'm
so fortunate to win the contest. I have enough money to take the bus from
Tromso to Olso, and then fly to New York City. Then I plan to take a Greyhound
bus to LA. But after carefully counting my funds, I find that I'm $20
short. If in the unlikely event that I win (although I'm spending all
my waking hours working on my entry) do you think that Mr Ford would be
willing to help me out by lending me the $20 I so desperately need?
(Enclosed is a special picture of me at the local naturist resort this
past summer.)
We responded thusly after looking very carefully at the enclosed picture:
We can assure you Mr Ford has no interest in meeting you. Mr Ford is a moral
man and disapproves of the naturist lifestyle. Your email has been deleted.
Please do not contact us again. We have kept your picture for further examination.
Unfortunately the stomach flu has swept through Luke Ford Fan Blog headquarters
rendering blogging very difficult over the past few days. We hope to be
better for Our Moral Leader's "60 Minutes" appearance tonight. Expect
a transcript by Monday containing all the profundities that will surely
pour forth from Mr Ford's lips during His interview. Incidentally, what
took CBS so long to recognize the socio-religious phenomenon that is Luke
Ford? Weird.
"60 Minutes" is a current affairs program that consists of three segments.
Mr Ford says that He will appear during segment two. For details go to
LukeFord.net. We don't know what
He will be lecturing us on, but in all likelihood it will be the moral
principles upon which He bases His life. If only we had the supernatural
insight and self-discipline that Our Moral Leader has then we too might
appear one day on a quality television show like "60 Minutes" or "Ricki
Lake" hectoring the great unwashed. Alas we come far sort of His moral
perfection. But we try to approximate His example as best we can.
Segment one is probably going to be a retrospective on great moral leaders
of the past, such as Moses, Jesus Christ, the Buddha, Martin Luther, Confucius,
and Jimmy Swaggart who have now been superseded by Mr Ford. In segment
two Our Moral Leader will appear nattily attired in black. We can't wait
to see what the Great One's office looks like. This is where He does His
thinking and writing, and what thoughts and words they are! We are bursting
with anticipation. Don't disappoint us Mr Ford! (Yeah, like you've every
disappointed anyone before! Hey, somtimes we kid. Not often though --
this is a very serious website about a very serious "man.")
Segment three is most likely going to cover the many millions of disciples
whose lives have been redeemed by reading His website. Funny, CBS didn't
contact us asking for our opinions. It's like they think Mr Ford has no
followers at all. How wrong they are! And they will be even more wrong
after Our Moral Leader's commanding performance tonight on "60 Minutes."
Did we tell you how we're just bursting with anticipation!
Luke Ford On 60 Minutes
I
will appear on the second segment Sunday night, November 23.
I spent the day before and the day after Yom Kippur with 60 Minutes correspondent
Steve Kroft and his producing crew. On Yom Kippur, I was sick and stayed
in bed all day.
The day after, I sat down with Kroft. I was dressed in my one good black
suit.
"Do you always go around in a suit and tie?" he asked. He and
his crew were dressed casually.
"Only when I'm speaking to 25 million people," I answered.
Unfortunately, a scarlet red bed was selected by the crew for the backdrop.
The 60 Mins. crew also took B-roll of my hovel, which horrified the two
producers. Sianne says it's the primary reason I'm not married. Unfortunately,
in the editing bay, the roll of my hovel looks completely normal.
One producer, Jamie, dared the other one, Sianne, to look into the garage
next to my hovel. She did and to her surprise, found nothing horrifying.
I tried to no avail to get them to shoot me in my van driving around
town singing Air Supply songs.
In honor of my appearance on TV, I'm going lay off any racism for the
next few days. It will be hard for me, but I will try.
60 Minutes
Tony
Pierce writes:
LA blogger Luke Ford was on 60 minutes a few days ago, and as you know
i'm a big fan of mr. ford. But when i saw what he was saying on 60 minutes
it was hard for me to think that he wasnt completely full of ----. The
most glaring load he hurled at me as I sat in my den this past Sunday
was when he ripped this one: "It's become popular, cool, acceptable
in this 18-to-25 age group. My age group, I'm 37, my age group and up,
we think porn is something that's shameful. But for kids half my age,
they think it's cool."
Adult film is a billion dollar business. Billion with a B as in boo-yah.
And it's been popular since the first caveman chiseled the first titty
on a wall. Of all people Luke Ford, formerly of lukeford.com, knows
this. He also knows that once you turn 26 you dont suddenly consider
it "shameful." 60 Minutes showed many people standing in line at an
Adult Film convention looking middle class, happy, and well beyond the
prized 18-25 demo. I saw a couple who looked 50+. And then the narrator
told us that there's even porn for "the '60 Minutes' set."
and not to get into someones religious business, but why is it in the
handful of events that i saw my buddy Luke at he was always wearing
his yarmulke, and yet as soon as 60 minutes shows up hes just a good-looking
aussie, as opposed to a good-looking aussie jew? tell you this my friends,
if you ever see my ass on 60 minutes, i wont spread generalizations
about 110 year olds, and i will be sporting my cubs hat.
Hey Tony, I was referring to the people who make ----. The new generation,
the 18-25 year old, have far less shame and far fewer compunctions about
the type of acts they will perform than those who are older. ---- stars
who are 30 tend to look down on the 18 year olds as gross and decadent.
---- company owners who are over 40 generally keep their occupation to
themselves when they mix socially.
Relevant writes
Tony: "There is no "old Luke" to bring back, Tony. You're simply
seeing him for who he is for the first time. (The hypnotizing power of
physical beauty is simply amazing.) Why it's taking the blogosphere so
long to see him for the unstable train wreck that he is is beyond me."
Luke says: "I'm a terrible narcissist because I found that comment
("hypnotizing power of physical beauty") flattering."
Will writes:
There is no question that the 18-25 demographic feel differently about
---- than we do. There is also no question that these kids are more
open and adventurous with their sexuality - in spite of being more monogamous
than we were at that age (probably due to the threat of AIDS). The critic
who charges your views might do well to silence himself. Indeed there
are 50+ and 100+ year-old people who enjoy ----, but that does not make
your statements false.
Your assertion of guilt associated with ---- for our age group is also
basically correct. My experience in the ---- shop was that the men came
to get it while the women stayed home. Today you will see young women
in selecting almost as often as the men.
My 60 Minutes Interview
Robin writes:
Dear Luke Ford, I never knew you until tonight while watching the show.
And what you said about the porn industry and the upcoming generation
thinking porn is cool is true. Every-thing you said resonates with me,
so much so I had to search your web site and write (a lengthily e-mail).
I've been trying to bring this issue to the main stream since I wrote
my memoirs over 3 years ago. You see I was a teenage prostitute for
7 years from the ages of 14 - 21. I worked the streets of Boston, NY,
DC and Florida for a black pimp 20 years my senior. Six of those years
being abused by him--physically and psychologically.
I am 43 now and am still struggling with the emotional and psychological
rape on my Soul during those years. I have tried to send essays to the
national woman's maga-zines and colleges, even Oprah about the recent
fascina-tion with the sex trade, lap dancing and pimp daddy's. But it
goes ignored. Even the language from "The Life" has infiltrated sub-urbia,
(hoe and bitch) and looked upon as cool. I am horrif-ied that "Girls
Gone Wild" and the reality dating shows pro-mote the exploitation of
young girls. No matter if it's promiscuity or prostitution the end result
is the same. It chips away at your self-esteem. You will eventually
find yourself shrouded in a shame so toxic it embeds itself deep down
into every corner of your being. Affecting each relationship forevermore.
There is nothing cool about that.
The exploitation of young women and girls needs to be brought to the
unknowledgeable masses by those with awareness of the consequences.
In order to prevent the seduction of vulnerable girls by those seeking
impressionable prey, self empowerment needs to start at home. But no
one seems to understand that---they think they are untouchable. As long
as the girl has a golden pussy between her legs---she will always be
considered a money maker. And if she can be manipulated and brain-washed
into believing she wants it too---the cycle will con-tinue until our
wombs are bleeding raw. So I think your community casting a frown upon
your work is misguided and ignorant to the bigger picture.
Lastly, from what I read on your web site though your families rendition
on who you are and how you've changed since the accident. I'd like to
say one thing. I understand you hit your head in between the eye brows.
In the etheric body it is the 3rd chakra - the third eye area (were
psychic information and dream stuff are perceived). I believe you have
activated that chakra by the blow to your head. Also I must add that
in the spirit world there is something known as a "walk-in." It can
happen when one is in a vulnerable unconscious state. It is believed
that an entity can step into your body to do unfinished work on the
earth plane without going through the rebirthing process. Using your
body to do so. Usually it is against the humans will, be-cause the Laws
of the Universe only permit such a spiritual violation with those humans
in agreement with the entity. To do work of GOODNESS not of Dark intent.
But the dark forces do as they will, and enter without your permission.
Reeking havoc on your body, mind and spirit, by indulging in every physical/earthly
desire they were addicted to be-fore death. They are unable to accept
they have died, therefore exploiting the unaware human to any of the
7 deadly sins.
When your mother mentioned your sudden obsession with working out,
and lack of food. The more run down you are---the more they can do.
Causing a definite personality change. The only professionals in the
medi-cal community I've found who can assist someone with this is a
Psychotherapist / White Witch. One in Boston I found years ago helped
me with certain techniques and put me on a path to a spiritual awakening.
I too began hugging trees. I still do sometimes. I used to go to Central
Park in NYC and just close my eyes and soak in the peace-fulness. There
is a strength and comfort in natures grandest beauties---it can bring
me to tears. It is unmatched by anything a human being can produce.
Also the serpent dreams and hallucinations are repre-sentative of:
in ancient times visions if the head of the ser-pent is up, ready to
strike, it denoted EVIL. If the head is down it denotes protection.
There is also serpent power in esoteric thinking. Relating to the Kundalini:
the fire / life's electricity lays dormant at the base of our spine,
travels up the spine towards the top of the head as one grows in Higher
Intelligence / God head. I experienced it once years ago spontaneously
while in a meditative group chant at an ashram. It felt like fire traveling
up my spine--cover-ing my entire back. I kept looking behind me because
I was convinced someone was holding a heater against me. I sat cross
legged on the floor sweating with this peculiar sensation over my entire
back. In meditation a lot of it comes back---but these days trying to
pursue a writing career---it is difficult to be still. I am temporarily
living in my sister's house, moving here to care for my mother who recently
died---so I am searching for a new identity---a new life without her.
Well, Luke I hope I didn't overwhelm you. But instead, given you some
insight into your own spiritual rebirthing. I haven't looked at your
old web site---but from your new one I see you've caused quite a stir.
I don't know if you're moving to Israel---but if you do, SHALOM.
|