* A very, very good article Steve. Of course, what you said about the US applies to all our countries now. What really adds insult to injury is that these globalists assume we’ll all be good little boys as they smash everything of ours and mock us while doing it. Straight, White men will be expected to give their oaths to a President Hillary Clinton as she mocks them from the White House? I’m expected to cheer because Justin Trudeau finally has a cabinet expressly chosen to exclude people like me? The indigenous peoples of Europe are supposed to cheer as they’re replaced and their women and children are raped on the street and in public swimming pools? Only people like Anne Applebaum or Bill Gates could demand will put up with all this. It only makes sense to them. To hell with all that.
* I find it odd that the professional left doesn’t realize that the Sanders/Trump appeal is a direct reaction to their (very successful) efforts to tribalize every element of the electorate other than whites.
Obviously there are some white elites who take a perverse pleasure in being subsumed by this coalition of the aggrieved, but that runs contrary to the instinct of self-preservation…I guess the only way to replenish their numbers is mau-mauing impressionable college students, hence the behavior we’re seeing at various campuses these last months.
* I suppose the elites pushing this sort of thing have supreme confidence in their as yet undemonstrated ability to ride the tiger. Perhaps they know something I don’t, but other recent examples of a despised ruling minority becoming a de facto political minority haven’t worked out too well – even for those who made a show of handing power over to the new political majority. History also teaches as a general rule that those new to power rarely exercise it with magnanimity.
* “Obviously there are some white elites who take a perverse pleasure in being subsumed by this coalition of the aggrieved, but that runs contrary to the instinct of self-preservation”
There is some gumbic truth to what you’re saying, but I think it’s wrong to make too much of ‘coalition of the aggrieved, fringes, or unhinges, etc.’
It is a sham coalition, it is only symbolically anti-white for most groups, and it is mostly dominated by Jews and white Libs.
Outwardly, it seems like this dark coalition is ganging up on whites. Rhetorically, it would seem that way. You see Arab, Hispanic, Asian, and Jewish ‘progressives’ chanting slogans at BLM rallies.
But in truth, these people don’t want to live in Detroit or move to some Negro city. They want to be with whites. Even if their PC side has been made to worship MLK and sympathize with blacks, they know the reality or come to know it when they live long live.
Hispanics may bitch about gringo but much prefer gringo over Negro. White-Hispanic mixing is very common. Same with yellows. Yellow girls may hold up some poster in support of BLM but they much prefer to live in white/Jewish parts of NY than in Detroit or Ferguson. And they might wanna marry white. And Jews have been gentrifying key cities are hectic rate. As for homos and trannies.. that’s when the whole thing turns into parody. I often see BLM and homo stuff combined at college towns, but homos are agents of globalist elites hellbent on gentrifying cities, i.e. drive blacks out.
So, the so-called coalition is loud but bogus.
Now, I’m not saying immigration is good for all whites. But white/Jewish elites are not being drowned or subsumed in some rising tide of color. If anything, most non-black minorities are useful against blacks. So, even though the elites are using non-black minorities against blacks, blacks are duped into thinking that they are forming some grand people of color coalition against the KKK.
Right, because all those Hindus and Chinese at Silicon Valley are siding with blacks against Tim Cook and Mark Zuckerberg.
And in the long run, nature wins out in the sexual realm. Too many Hispanic and Asian women marry white men even as they symbolically bitch about ‘white privilege’ because they’ve been brainwashed to do so at their fancy colleges.
Of course, not all whites win out. Working class whites do lose. But even many of them would prefer non-black minorities to black ones.
PS: maybe they can devise a form of genetic injection. According to Sailer’s review of THE DESCENDANTS, the big landowners of Hawaii are mostly white but have some trace Hawaiian blood. So, they count as Hawaiians and have blood claim on the land.
Maybe there is way to inject 1% of black/brown/yellow/Jewish/Arab DNA into all whites. That way, they will still be mostly white but have the ‘one drop’ to be counted as People of Color.
And they can claim to be victims of ‘white privilege’.
* If “too white” is a fair complaint, then “too Jewish” is as well.
If “too Jewish” is unfair and derogatory, then so is “too white.”
* Sanders seems to be getting traction due to his pretense to education debt forgiveness/free college, which would disproportionately benefit whites. Of course, benefits to NAMs is a central plank of the Democrats’ platform without which they can’t win, so it’s a given and need not be spoken of too loudly (although this may change post Sharpton Soul Food Summit). The underemployed college graduates/debt laden students consider it an act of noblesse oblige to steal bread from the mouths of doctors/small businessmen they’ve been led to believe are actually secretly hedge fund managers and distribute it to the brown hordes.
Conversely, the Trump phenomenon seems to be the case of one man appealing to the one constituency neither major party wants enough to be seen with even if it guarantees an electoral victory – viz., bad whites. Think about that – the Democrats would rather pander to literal criminals and their supporters (restoring voting rights, criminal justice “reform,” end mandatory minimums, #BLM, etc.) and illegal aliens than have bad whites as a part of their coalition, while Republicans would rather jettison pillars of the conservative movement for a maximum 40% of the Hispanic vote than have bad whites as part of their coalition. Law abiding, tax-paying, community-involved and patriotic people which are so derided in popular media that neither major party will sully itself to make an appeal to them.
