The Genius Of German-Jewry

From page 58 of Anti-Semitism Before the Holocaust by Albert S Lindemann regarding the 19th Century:

Jews in German lands were, at any rate, around ten times more numerous than in Britain, and the interplay of Jew and non-Jew was more remarkable in German-speaking lands than in the English-speaking ones. In some elusive but potent way, that interplay unleashed genius of simply spectacular dimensions. Any list of the most famous and influential intellects of European civilization between the French Revolution and the Nazi takeover would contain a strongly disproportionate number of German Jews…

Posted in Germany, Jews | Comments Off on The Genius Of German-Jewry

The People Who Built This Country

I was watching Donald Trump speak in Mobile, Alabama, Friday night and he said the crowd was composed of the people who built this country.

Was he discussing America’s white gentile core or the coalition of the fringe (trannies, homos, blacks, Jews, etc)?

Greg Johnson writes:

In the United States, the center-Left Democratic Party is a coalition of white liberals, non-whites, sexual minorities, religious dissenters, and environmentalists, in which the organized Jewish community is the senior partner.

All of these groups want a larger, more intrusive, more profligate government to insure the inclusion and upward mobility of previously marginalized groups: women, non-whites, homosexuals, trannies, snail darters, etc.

The center-Right Republican Party is far less diverse: 90% of its votes come from white people — disproportionately male, conservative, straight, family-oriented, and Christian white people. The Democrats are increasingly the party of the underclass and the super-rich. The Republicans are increasingly the party of the middle class. Republican voters typically want a smaller, less-intrusive, fiscally responsible government that leaves them the freedom to raise their families, produce wealth, and carry forward a nation and way of life that their ancestors created and that suits them just fine.

The Republicans are the party of the people who built and sustain America. If every Democratic voter dropped dead, we would lose 10% of our most creative people and 90% of our craziest, crookedest, and most destructive. The result would be a slightly boring but highly productive, orderly, and happy society — Switzerland on a continental scale.

If every Republican voter dropped dead, however, the country would be finished in short order, for the dirty secret of the Left is that they are parasitic on the Right. Consumption is parasitic on production; vice is parasitic on virtue; the sick are parasitic on the healthy; evil is parasitic on good. We can live without them, but they cannot live without us.

However, if you look at Republican politicians and pundits, you would think that the exact opposite is true, for they completely accept and cringingly fear the moral authority of the Left. If the Left calls Republicans “racists,” they obsequiously choose a black running mate, adopt a black child, or avow their belief in color-blind individualism. Only a few Republicans actually talk back to the Left, but most spirited response you’ll find is “You’re the real racists,” which of course does not challenge the underlying premise that racism is evil — or the deeper assumption that the psychotic parasites of the Left have any moral authority whatsoever.

The Democratic Party has no qualms about representing the interests of its constituencies. It offers upward mobility to the marginalized, and to its white constituents, especially the refractory straight male ones (especially those who happen to marry white women and reproduce themselves), it offers the promise of absolution from collective guilt for an ever-growing litany of isms and phobias by taking active part in their political dispossession and cultural degradation.

The rules of Democratic politics are simple: every group can appeal to its particular interests except whites, particularly straight white males. Whites have no collective interests, only collective guilt for the sufferings of the rest of humanity. Any hint of positive white self-awareness, much less organized white-interest politics, is stigmatized as racism, nativism, even National Socialism — and we know where that leads.

To exist, the Republican Party needs to get middle class white people’s votes. Astonishingly, though, Republicans will not appeal to the ethnic interests of white voters. But they will appeal nakedly to the crassest ethnic interests of blacks, mestizos (including outright invaders), and Jews — groups that persist in giving most of their votes to Democrats.

Posted in Donald Trump | Comments Off on The People Who Built This Country

African Migrants Must Be Sent Home

Comments to Steve Sailer:

Those already in Europe must be sent back. They must be seen as foreigners, not as Europeans. As long as they are allowed to be ‘new Europeans’, the new official premise of Europe will be a black African is just as European as a white European with ancestral roots in Europe. If that is the ideological and moral premise, then the floodgates will be opened once again.

Posted in Africa, Europe | Comments Off on African Migrants Must Be Sent Home

Why Doesn’t Anyone Attack Carlos Slim?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* The fact that Slim is not being criticized is akin to the old phrase that the ‘silence is deafening’. With Slim being essentially the richest man on the planet, and coming from a nation with high levels of poverty, you’d think he would be firmly fixed in the cross hairs of the SJWs of the NY Times as prima facie evidence of crony capitalism at its worst. To have his level of wealth with so much of Mexico impoverished to the point they have been fleeing their country for the past 30 to 40 years is sickening. Too bad the SJWs don’t really have any principles other than attacking Western culture and peoples. In Slim’s case they might actually do some good in attacking this creep. But apparently he doesn’t fit their target profile.

Posted in Mexicans | Comments Off on Why Doesn’t Anyone Attack Carlos Slim?

Tatu Vanhanen RIP

From Wikipedia: Tatu Vanhanen (17 April 1929 – 22 August 2015) was a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Tampere in Tampere, Finland. Vanhanen was a coauthor with Richard Lynn of IQ and the Wealth of Nations (2002) and IQ and Global Inequality (2006), and author of Ethnic Conflicts Explained by Ethnic Nepotism (1999) and many other works. His son, Matti Vanhanen, is a former Prime Minister of Finland.

Vanhanen developed an interest in evolutionary biology after studying E. O. Wilson’s sociobiology and later in his career wrote about intelligence and inequality. However, most of his academic work dealt with democratization, which he had studied with international comparative methods. Vanhanen was known for his Index of Democratization.[1]

In 2004, the Ombudsman of Minorities, Mikko Puumalainen, wanted the police to start an investigation regarding Vanhanen’s interview with a Helsingin Sanomat magazine Kuukausiliite, in which he stated that “Whereas the average IQ of Finns is 97, in Africa it is between 60 and 70. Differences in intelligence are the most significant factor in explaining poverty”.[2] The Finnish National Bureau of Investigations was considering launching a preliminary investigation on Vanhanen’s speech but later decided against it, not finding that he had incited hatred against an ethnic group or committed any other crime.[3]

Vanhanen died on 22 August 2015 after a long period of illness, aged 86.

Posted in IQ | Comments Off on Tatu Vanhanen RIP

RAW: Thousands of migrants, refugees rush past police across Greece-Macedonia border

RT: “Police used stun grenades against the crowd as hundreds of refugees breached police lines. Migrants are being held behind barbed wire on the Greek side of the border with Macedonia. Macedonia has declared a state of emergency on its southern and northern borders over a surge in migrants and refugees.”

Posted in Immigration | Comments Off on RAW: Thousands of migrants, refugees rush past police across Greece-Macedonia border

Australians Are Such Racists

From Nicholas Stix:

(N.S.: I just found this essay here, at the Australian Web site, The Realists. Although it sounds like me, I didn’t write it. Of course, there are millions of American whites who could have written the same words. The interesting part is that the author, Paul Sheehan, is an Aussie—apparently of Irish descent—a columnist for the Sydney Morning Herald. However, I very much doubt that Sheehan—not to be confused with leftwing American propagandist Neil Sheehan—would be able to get away with writing such an honest essay today. Except for the essay’s first clause, all emphases and hyperlinks were added by me.)

By Paul Sheehan
The Sydney Morning Herald, 20 May 1995

The longest war America has ever fought is the Dirty War, and it is not over. It has lasted 30 years so far and claimed more than 25 million victims. It has cost almost as many lives as the Vietnam War. It determined the result of last year’s congressional election. And it helps explain the paranoid undertow of American politics that found its most gruesome expression in the Oklahoma City bombing.

Yet the American news media do not want to talk about the Dirty War, which remains between the lines and unreported. In fact, to even suggest that the war exists is to be discredited. So let’s start suggesting, immediately.

No matter how crime figures are massaged by those who want to acknowledge or dispute the existence of a Dirty War, there is nothing ambiguous about what the official statistics portray: for the past 30 years a large segment of black America has waged a war of violent retribution against white America.

And the problem is getting worse, not better. In the past 20 years, violent crime has increased more than four times faster than the population. Young blacks (under 18) are more violent than previous generations and are 12 times more likely to be arrested for murder than young whites.

Nearly all the following figures, which speak for themselves, have not been reported in America:

• According to the latest US Department of Justice survey of crime victims, more than 6.6 million violent crimes (murder, rape, assault and robbery) are committed in the US each year, of which about 20 per cent, or 1.3 million, are inter-racial crimes.
• Most victims of race crime — about 90 per cent — are white, according to the survey “Highlights From 20 Years of Surveying Crime Victims”, published in 1993.
• Almost 1 million white Americans were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by black Americans in 1992, compared with about 132,000 blacks who were murdered, robbed, assaulted or raped by whites, according to the same survey.
• Blacks thus committed 7.5 times more violent inter-racial crimes than whites even though the black population is only one-seventh the size of the white population. When these figures are adjusted on a per capita basis, they reveal an extraordinary disparity: blacks are committing more than 50 times the violent racial crimes of whites.
• According to the latest annual report on murder by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, most inter-racial murders involve black assailants and white victims, with blacks murdering whites at 18 times the rate that whites murder blacks.

These breathtaking disparities began to emerge in the mid-1960s, when there was a sharp increase in black crime against whites, an upsurge which, not coincidentally, corresponds exactly with the beginning of the modern civil rights movement.

Over time, the cumulative effect has been staggering. Justice Department and FBI statistics indicate that between 1964 and 1994 more than 25 million violent inter-racial crimes were committed, overwhelmingly involving black offenders and white victims, and more than 45,000 people were killed in inter-racial murders. By comparisons 58,000 Americans died in Vietnam, and 34,000 were killed in the Korean War.

When non-violent crimes (burglary, larceny, car theft and personal theft) are included, the cumulative totals become prodigious. The Bureau of Justice Statistics says 27 million non-violent crimes were committed in the US in 1992, and the survey found that 31 per cent of the robberies involved black offenders and white victims (while only 2 per cent in the reverse).

When all the crime figures are calculated, it appears that black Americans have committed at least 170 million crimes against white Americans in the past 30 years. It is the great defining disaster of American life and American ideals since World War II.

Apologists for black crime have always argued that such crime is largely economic, not racial; whites have the money, while blacks have the poverty. This rationalisation is only partly true. Unfortunately, the racist character of the Dirty War is obvious every day in a cascade of large and small animosities.

It is the more than 1,600 murders of whites by blacks each year, hundreds of them overtly racial, such as the killing of 19-year-old Michael Westerman in Tennessee, who was shot to death in January by four black youths because he was flying a confederate flag on his truck.

It is the belief held by a dominant majority of black Amer¬icans that O. J. Simpson should be acquitted of charges of murdering two white people, despite a superhighway of DNA evidence linking him to the murder scene, despite his long record of violence against women, and despite his complete absence of an alibi.

It is the naked racism and anti-Semitism of the black news media (which goes unchallenged by the mainstream media). Typically black newspapers and radio stations threw their support behind Colin Ferguson last year, arguing that he went on a rampage, shooting 19 whites, because he was deranged by “black rage”, a symptom caused by white racism.

It is the atavistic rhetoric of the Rev Louis Farrakhan and the Nation of Islam, whose rallies attract 20,000 people cheering Farrakhan’s calls for violence against the white devils.

It is my own experience with black Americans in the past decade, which includes attempted murder, assault, theft, bottle-throwing, being showered with beer, and being called “cracker”, “honkey”, “motherf. . .er”, “white trash”, and “blue-eyed devil”.

The general debauching of the civil rights movement is the great undercurrent of American politics today. It expresses itself in a multitude of code terms substituted for black violence and black failure. It was the well-spring of the Republican election triumph last year, a triumph whose velocity the American media completely failed to foresee.

Now the US is confronting the spectre of violent white reaction. Tellingly, the prime suspect in the Oklahoma City bombing, Timothy McVeigh, is virulently anti-black. And the militia movement from which he sprang despises the Federal Government’s aggressive preferences for blacks in jobs, education and civil rights.

This fury is not confined to the margins of society. The National Rifle Association, with its 3.5 million members and power in the Republican Party, is constantly harping about “jackboot tactics” by the Federal Government and its anti-government rhetoric in the wake of the Oklahoma bombing even prompted former President Bush to resign his membership.

Black America, too, has its own paranoid, anti-police, armed groups – hundreds of them, with tens of thousands of members. These are called gangs. It is no coincidence that the city with the highest concentration of gangs, Los Angeles, was in a state of virtual civil war in 1992 during the Rodney King riots, which the black community still describes as an “uprising”.

All these are facts, yet by simply writing this story, by assembling the facts in this way, I would be deemed a racist by the American news media. It prefers to maintain a paternalistic double-standard in its coverage of black America, a lower standard.

Posted in Australia, Blacks | Comments Off on Australians Are Such Racists

Sweden’s Nationalists Now Lead Polls

Barbara Lerner Spectre tweets: “Sweden’s nazi party now most popular party, we should be concerned for sweden’s jews and minorities, dark times ahead.”

Barbara, maybe another condescending video dictating how Sweden has to commit national suicide is in order?

Kevin MacDonald writes in 2010: In the video below, Barbara Lerner Spectre, who runs a government-funded Jewish study group in Sweden, makes the following remarkable statement—remarkable because she does not attribute anti-Jewish attitudes to irrational prejudices or even Muslims who hate Israel. Instead she says that it’s because of the “leading role” played by Jews in the movement toward multiculturalism:

I think there is a resurgence of anti-Semitism because at this point in time Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we are going to be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not going to be the monolithic societies they once were in the last century. Jews are going to be at the centre of that. It’s a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive.

Her comment is an example of the age-old Jewish self-concept of a “Light Unto the Nations”: Jews saving Europe by leading it to multiculturalism. One wonders why she thinks Europe could not survive as a set of monocultural societies. Israel and many other societies function quite well with a recognized dominant culture and people and, as repeatedly emphasized here, multicultural societies have a hosts of costs and no visible benefits. The better question, of course, is how Europe can survive multiculturalism. By definition, it can’t.

The interview is part of a longer set of interviews available here.

Posted in Immigration, Jews | Comments Off on Sweden’s Nationalists Now Lead Polls

IBT: Holocaust victims’ traumas could be passed onto their children in DNA


Mike writes: I thought for sure that Holocaust guilt and reparations would be ended after all the WWII survivors expired. But the efforts to extend Holocaust benefits is now gaining traction in a very creative way: epigenetics.

Rather than a personal injury, anti-Semitism is being recast as a genetic injury. A continuous, ongoing, injury inflicted on completely innocent Jewish babies for all eternity. That, my friends, is a moneymaker! The Germans (really, all white gentiles) will never be off the hook for Jewish guilt and reparations.

This poses a problem for us goyim. Once the Jewish Nation establishes genetic transference of anti-semitic injury, blacks are going to try to piggyback on the Jewish research. If blacks can determine epigenetic markers associated with slavery, they can similarly establish eternal reparations/guilt for black folks as well.

I say “try to” because black folks are going to have serious problems finding black geneticists who will crank out the “scientific” studies necessary to establish an eternal moral/legal claim.

Then again, Jewish geneticists may volunteer for the job and analyze black DNA for free. After all, if both Jews and blacks can claim a continuing genetic injury for the Holocaust and slavery, they would both be in a much better position to extract more guilt and cash from white gentiles forever. Instead of just (2%) American Jews (quite wealthy on average), they could glom onto an additional 13% blacks (quite poor on average), for a total of 15% of Americans (very poor on average) that eternally suffer at the hands of white Gentiles.

Think of it this way: how can affirmative action ever end when the injury and suffering is passed down epigenetically with each new generation?

This truly is a brilliant political maneuver. Periodically Google “holocaust epigenetic” to see if it is gaining traction.

Posted in Holocaust | Comments Off on IBT: Holocaust victims’ traumas could be passed onto their children in DNA

Planned Inhumanities: From Roe to Obergefell

Robert Oscar Lopez writes: The flip side of the disposable child, of course, is the child as a desired commodity. Since people can be thrown out when they are not convenient, they can also be manufactured and maintained through industrialized processes, when the natural process of lovemaking is not convenient. And alas, this leads us straight to the sublimities of Justice Kennedy’s majority opinion in Obergefell v. Hodges.

Kennedy’s opinion emphasized the constitutional right of gay couples not to be lonely. According to Kennedy, the Fourteenth Amendment assures that gay couples should be given marriage licenses lest they call out to the universe and find nobody to answer back to their emotional needs with love.

Obergefell brings Roe v. Wade to its climax because it completes the transformation of children into objects. For children will be forced to love gay adults who are not their parents. To Kennedy, gay adults have a right not to feel lonely, which includes the right to start families. In fact, he states that they have a right to “custody” and “birth certificates” (i.e., birth certificates falsified to include two same-sex parents and erase biological parents of the opposite sex). To satisfy the human right to dignity and to thwart the civil injustice of “loneliness,” children must be produced and provided to people who want them, whether or not those people conceived the child by making love.

Children not only can, but must be manufactured. The transfers of custody must generate orphans and abandoned children, paying gamete donors and surrogates to abandon and orphan their offspring, so that this new product—the loving and obedient human being—can be delivered to paying customers.

You can’t be against Roe but for Obergefell. It all goes together. The small but crucial part of the electorate—largely made up of younger Americans—who oppose abortion but support gay marriage are perilously deluded. The objectification of children through one means will lead inexorably to the objectification of children through another means. The “child as waste product” and “child as product for sale” are the same child: the dehumanized and “planned” child suited to make paying customers happy.

Posted in Homosexuality | Comments Off on Planned Inhumanities: From Roe to Obergefell