Gay Porn Kingpin Takes on LGBT Boycott Israel Movement

Makes me proud to be Jewish.

Who would have thought there were Jews in porn?

From Breitbart:

TEL AVIV – The boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement targeting Israel is nothing more than old fashioned anti-Semitism disguised as political activism, Michael Lucas, a gay pornographic film actor and director, declared in a radio interview on Sunday.

Lucas is founder and CEO of Lucas Entertainment, New York’s largest gay adult film company and one of the biggest gay porn production companies in the world.

The BDS movement is “all about political correctness but basically it’s all about good old Jew hatred,” he said.

“It’s all about anti-Semitism. They hate Jews. Now we have a new word: Israel. It’s really considered after the Holocaust to be very inappropriate and low class to say, ‘We hate Jews.’ So they say, ‘You know, we disagree with the Zionist policies. Israel get out from the West Bank. Get out from Palestine.’ Why the hell and how dare the world tell Israel that Jews should leave Palestine, that Jews should leave the West Bank.”

Lucas made the comments on “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio,” the popular Sunday night talk-radio program broadcast on New York’s AM 970 The Answer and Philadelphia’s NewsTalk 990 AM. Klein doubles as Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter.

Lucas was speaking after over 200 rowdy BDS protesters stormed the gay rights Creating Change Conference at the Chicago Hilton on Friday and used intimidation tactics to cancel an event hosted by A Wider Bridge, an organization that advocates the relationship between the “LGBTQ communities of North America and Israel.”

The National LGBTQ Task Force, which organized the conference, had weeks earlier cancelled the Wider Bridge reception but reinstated it last week after pressure from major Jewish organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League.

Israel is “losing the fight in the U.S.,” Lucas warned. “Those anti-Israeli groups are successfully convincing Democrats and liberals that Palestinians are the underdogs. And people usually don’t think for themselves.”

Lucas has been a staunch supporter of the Jewish state, writing opinion pieces targeting Israel’s critics in such publications as The Advocate, Huffington Post and Pink News. He also released a gay porn film titled “Men of Israel,” which was reportedly the first such film shot on location in Israel and using an all Israeli and all Jewish cast. Lucas called the film “a bold move to promote Israeli culture and tourism.”

Writing in Out Magazine last week, Lucas slammed the anti-Israel protesters at Friday’s LGBTQ event in Chicago as “thugs” who were “not interested in dialogue. They comprised an enraged gang filled with Jew-hatred, bent on intimidating and silencing LGBT Jews who have any connection to the state of Israel.”

His Israel advocacy has not been without consequence, however. Lucas says anti-Israel protesters follow him to speeches at universities and stalk him at public events in the porn industry.

“In the gay world I have made lots of people hate me,” he told Klein. “There were a lot of calls from the gay community overall to boycott my films. That was funny. Good luck.”

Lucas slammed his critics as uneducated, explaining they are misusing the word “racism.”

He stated:

People accuse you of racism because you speak for Israel. That’s not actually racism. Palestinians and Muslims are not a race. Such a terrible use of the English language. Speaking for Israel does not make you more popular. It gives you accusations of racism. Of Islamophobia – whatever that means. And you become politically incorrect. It’s all about political correctness but basically it’ all about good old Jew hatred. It’s all about anti-Semitism.



Posted in Homosexuality, Israel, Pornography | Comments Off on Gay Porn Kingpin Takes on LGBT Boycott Israel Movement

What Happened To Trump?

Comments to Steve Sailer:

* A poll conducted a couple of days ago and an entrance poll at the caucases today showed Trump leading, but he’s losing the actual caucus vote. It’s hard to admit being for Trump in public. The other primaries will be decided by secret ballot, where Trump’s opponents won’t have this advantage.

* Rubio wants to increase neocon wars, flood the U.S. with cheap labor (illegals), and support TPP. Ted Cruz wants to quintuple H1B visa workers, support TPP, et al. I say fuck conservative middle America. They had one last chance with a non-politician billionaire. But they’re too stupid to know what’s good for them. I’m a 2%-er living comfortably in Massachusetts. Fuck those evangelical losers with low IQs in flyover country and I’m done caring about them.

* What’s great about those numbers is how much room for growth there is in there for Cruz vs. Rubio. Forced to choose between the two is a Trump/Paul/Carson voter more likely to choose Rubio or Cruz?

68.4% of the vote appears to be going to the Fuck RINOs Party. That’s the number we see over and over again nationwide – polls showing ~70% of GOP voters wanting anyone but an establishment candidate. Win or lose in November this revolt isn’t dying anytime soon.


* I think the very fact that Trump firmly staked a claim on what was believed to be a politically untenable position – building a wall and expelling illegal immigrants, confirms that he is sincere in this position and will attempt to follow through. If he didn’t want to do it, why in the world would he campaign on that platform when the conventional wisdom was that it was stance held only by racist Nazi sympathizers? I think Trump was truly convinced by Coulter’s book.

I also think it’s safe to believe in his trade protectionist positions. He is on the record advocating a more pro-America stance on trade deals since the 80′s.

I have no idea if he can be expected to follow through on his rhetoric with respect to guns or abortion, but I don’t really care much. The 2nd Amendment will still protect our guns rights, and nobody has done anything about abortion for 40 years so there’s no reason that Trump will do anything different.

* Iowa has picked the correct GOP candidate 3 of the last 7 contested races so all the losers have something to cling to tonight. Cruz won by throwing bibles around and that means he has zero chance in New Hampshire. But, Rubio will be the darling of the Conservative Industrial Complex now so my guess is they drag him over the line in New Hampshire.

The funny thing to me is we’re going to get Clinton – Lazio 2.0 in the general with Bootsie playing the role of Rick Lazio. If I did not know better, I’d think these things are scripted.

* I’m disappointed, but I don’t think Trump sitting out the debate had anything to do with it. Certainly, there weren’t a lot of Trump voters going to Rubio.

What appears to have happened is that turnout was high, and a lot of that turnout went to Rubio or Cruz, both of whom were energized by fear that Trump might win.

However, Trump had to have done pretty well to keep 24% of the vote, which means he wasn’t asleep at the wheel.

Immigration isn’t a big deal in Iowa, and in fact, shockingly, many learned that the cities are “sanctuary cities”, meaning they’d lose funding under Trump or Cruz.

Trump had a good speech. That shows he’s in it to win it. Let’s hope he comes out hard for immigration restriction. And if there are too many anti-restrictionists out there, then it’s justs not the time.

I don’t think I’ve posted this yet, my Trump post: It’s the Immigration, Stupid.

* Holy shit, look at Bill Clinton. He’s a f–king vegetable. It looks like he’s actually dead and embalmed, and they’re just jerking his body around with strings.

* 8 out of 10 Trump supporters don’t have college degrees and many of them have never voted before. You need an army of volunteers knocking on doors and dragging these people to the polls. Otherwise, they’ll be sitting at home watching TV. Trump should seriously consider investing more in a serious ground game. Being a New Yorker, a celebrity, a TV star, and having enjoyed all the media coverage and favorable poll numbers for the past 6 months, Trump probably underestimates the basic mechanics and nitty gritty of electoral politics.

* Cruz made a good case before the election that, if you want anyone other than Trump to win, you should vote for him in Iowa, because a) he had the best chance of beating Trump there and, b) If Trump won Iowa, the race would be over.

* It would seem that many Iowa Republicans saw Cruz – who is also described (wrongly, to my sense of matters) as an “outsider” – as the safer “outsider” choice to Mr. Trump who is an actual outsider. Cruz’s Iowa ground game was also far more muscular than Mr. Trump’s nonexistent one. All that considered, in national terms I might lean toward reading their numbers as an actual tie.

The real shock is Rubio’s strong third-place numbers. How a Midwestern Republican could vote for Rubio is beyond my power to comprehend. But then Iowa has had some twenty-to-thirty years of LaRazatino meat-processing & stoop labor immigrants whose Chamber of Commerce employers may be more than a little inclined to support a rat like Rubio.

Sanders’s numbers come as no shock at all. For the last two weeks Enemedia-Pravda have been giving Sanders a propaganda boost at the same time as they’ve been boosting Hilligula while also reporting on the latest State Department release of her cavalierly handled “special access programs” e-mails. If Sanders runs away from Hilligula in New Hampshire, look for Enemedia-Pravda to worship Sanders in exactly the same way they worshipped candidate Obama – and to promote Hilligula as Sanders’s top veep choice. To me the most depressing thing about Sanders is this: Sanders is purely the product of forty years of the radicals’ takeover of public edudoctrination of America’s children – including children of blue collar Americans who have been most grievously screwed by Sanders/SJW types.

* Suppose in order to win the nomination, Trump may have to simply remain competitive in the Bible Belt states, and win outright in such states Northeastern/Rust Belt/Upper Midwest/Pacific as NY; PA; New England as well as OH; MI; WI; IL; and also CA; NV; CO; out west. Could that be done?

Because if all the Bible Belt primaries want is for someone to read the Bible to them and not really discuss the issues, then son of a preacher has it pretty easy. Trump’s great ace in the hole or, “Trump” card may just be that he’s from the Northeast and perhaps could use that to his advantage in the West, where social issues/religious language isn’t as strongly appealing in a primary, particularly in CA. As the US’s biggest state ergo it must also carry the most delegates (even though most of the time the primary race is pretty much over by the time CA primary voters go to vote).

* There’s an earlier shot of the three family members on a stage with Bill in the middle. They are all holding hands, and it looks like he actually needs support to stand. He has fallen so far, so fast that it’s impossible not to notice.

It’s not just his physical state that alarmed me somewhat. Did you catch Hillary’s wild eyes in her victory speech? She looked ready to leap from the stage, jump in the cab of a long haul truck, and drive an all nighter to Oregon. Whatever she’s on, it’s the good stuff.

* Iowa was always one of Trump’s weakest states. Unfortunately the chance he might win it, as was indicated by the most recent polls, makes this feels like a loss rather than a solid start. Thankfully he is so far ahead in NH and SC I can’t see those results changing. Ultimately there has been little change in the delegate number he has won, one less than had he won. The result does explain why Cruz started attacking Rubio though.

* Veganism seems to have sapped Bill’s powers.

* Rubio is the new GOP mafia darling since Jebra is a dud. Could there be something nefarious going on? Check out where and by how many votes Rubio surprisingly came in a strong number ONE.

* Rubio’s showing stinks of fraud. None of the polls hinted at anything of the kind, and he’s not the sort of candidate who gets massive grassroots support that might be underrepresented in the polls (e.g. Ron Paul in 2012). And the voting software was provided by a major Rubio donor (Microsoft).

* Cruz doesn’t even have a path to win the nomination. He will get schlonged in any state without a heavy population of evangelicals. Your choices, if you’re supporting a Republican primary candidate, comes down to Trump or Rubio/Bush et al.

But I’d argue you’re wrong about Cruz’s general election electability.

He does very well with “very conservative” voters, hence the Iowa win. But he won’t carry swing states. Take a look at the Obama-Romney map and try to find 270 for Cruz. Its tough.

Trump can win Michigan, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, and he may even put New York and New Hampshire in play. He’s stronger in swing states mostly due to Trade and secular appeal.

* Cruz’s Swaggert performance was quite funny. Mike Savage said on his radio show that “For a moment there I thought Cruz was going to pull a snake out!”

* No surprises here. A lot at risk. The Establishment wins again … as it must to keep the system going. I wonder how much political chicanery went on behind the scenes. We not only have a rigged economy. We also have a rigged electoral system.

The Republicans don’t get it. Imagine running Romney as a candidate for President … someone from among the Wall Street M&A insiders who promises to increase jobs. [?] Imagine running Cruz as a candidate for President … someone whose wife is a principal at Goldman Sachs and who has taken political loans from Goldman Sachs in the past. [?] So obvious …! Why can’t Republicans camouflage their hand a bit better?

I can imagine a third party run that splits the vote. If Trump runs as an independent, Cruz is “toast”. If Sanders runs as an independent, Hillary is “toast”. If necessary, let’s hope both run as independents. Then, no one can credibly claim they were elected to the presidency with something like 25%-30% of the vote. Sometimes a stalemate is best so that the “winner” cannot press the illusion of empowerment.


* The truth is that the liberal media-driven campaign has won again. They made massive and concerted effort to paint Trump a second coming of Hitler. And it worked – huge caucus turnout meant that people in Iowa went to caucus in droves with one main goal: stop Trump.

Face it: the tiny number of people who control 90% of our media had won almost every war they waged against core American population: offshoring, trade agreements, immigration, restrictions on freedom of speech, feminism, homosexuality, wars abroad. Guns are the only exception. (But wait, that win will come, too).

* We’ve just witnessed jeb’s campaign blow through a huge war chest for negligible results. Do the consultants working for him suffer any consequences in their careers? Do they have to go work for some small time incumbents in impregnable districts to rebuild credibility? Or can they just blame Jeb as a bad candidate and hop right back on high profile senate and presidential campaigns?

* “baby boomers are truly the worst generation”

I’m one of them and unfortunately there is too much truth in what you say. We erred in not telling our children that the whole inclusion thing was just a passing fad, conceived of and spoken in a fog of pot smoke. “Hey kids, you weren’t supposed to take it seriously.” After all, we didn’t. Although we marched with blacks during protests on campus, just look at who we chose for neighbors when we went to buy a house and start a family. Not a groid in sight.

But our daughters really believed that they were supposed to earn their liberal bonafides by dating black guys. And our sons listen to mono-tonal ghetto music on the radio to the exclusion of everything else. The music put out by modern white guys is tepid and thin, a distant echo of the muscular, melodic Rock of our, the baby-boomer generation. Modern white-guy music is a thin cry of anguish at being ignored by the wider culture in general and white girls in particular.

And our election of rootless Obama, an abandoned, mixed-race, foster child, adopted out to a family of an alien culture and then raised by his Grandparents was and is the perfect expression of our dazed and confused state. We attributed magical powers to him and bestowed honorifics upon ourselves for our open mindedness and magnanimity in helping the symbol of a prostrate race off the mat. But self congratulation is not an adequate map or basis for a plan for moving forwards.

So, we’ll just throw it all at you and leave it to your generation to figure out.

Good Luck!

* Iowans are not natural Trump supporters, even in the absence of the evangelical Christian and ethanol subsidies. Trump, to many Iowans, is an abrasive New York real estate/casino developer on his third trophy wife. His claim to fame is a television program in which he summarily fired a contestant a week. Moreover, his principal policy difference with the rest of the Republican field, immigration, is something that doesn’t yet resonate with most Iowans. Iowa has only limited immigration, so it’s still the smiling Mexican restaurant owner, and not the drug gang that Iowans think of when they think immigration.

So I’m surprised that Trump did as well as he did. It tells me that, even in Iowa, Donald Trump is tapping into an anxiety about where the country is headed. The dead heat between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders on the Democratic side, also tells me the same anxiety is being felt there as well.



Posted in America, Donald Trump | Comments Off on What Happened To Trump?

Mark Zuckerberg Warns Iowa Ahead of Vote to Reject Trump

From Breitbart: As first-in-the-nation Iowa voters prepare to caucus, open borders financier Mark Zuckerberg weighed in on the race through the president of his powerful immigration lobbying firm,

In a Monday CNBC interview, President Todd Schulte made clear his view that Iowans should reject the candidacy of Donald Trump.

Zuckerberg’s spokesman Schulte told CNBC’s Sqawk Alley:

For the first time, a major party [is] putting forth people who are saying they are going to round up and deport 11.5 million people; they’re going to eliminate high-skilled immigration… And look, that may get you a win or second place in the Iowa caucuses. That is just a horrible and fatal position in a general election.

Shulte elaborated just a few hours ago with more attacks on the GOP frontrunner. Schulte tweeted: “Trump’s a hack, runs for [sic] policy specifics. Be it immigration, trade, foreign policy – answer is always he’s a strongman, others are weak.”

Schulte continued: “On immigration, he wandered into something awful that credentialed past apostasies as ok – rounding up every last undocumented immigrant.”

Zuckerberg’s is also backed by tech giant Bill Gates. Gates has argued for the unlimited admission of foreign workers authorized to take American jobs. is also backed by other supporters of mass immigration, such as Google’s Eric Schmidt and former Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer.

Todd Schulte was named president of the organization in September of last year after his predecessor, Joe Greene, was reportedly “forced” out after revealing his organization’s apparent view that foreign workers are better than Americans.

This is not the first time Zuckerberg’s lobbying firm has attacked the GOP frontrunner.

Ahead of September’s CNN GOP debate, Zuckerberg’s immigration firm released an attack ad targeting Donald Trump, in which the lobbying group lectured the Republican Party on the need to pass so-called “immigration reform,” by which means mass amnesty combined with more foreign workers on visas for big businesses.

Similarly, following the release of Donald Trump’s immigration policy paper last summer, Schulte wrote a blog post on the website in which he described Trump supporters as “hard-line anti-immigrant restrictionists” who “rant that immigrants are taking jobs away from ‘real’ Americans.”

The number of immigrants in the U.S. is currently at a record high of more than 42 million. Nearly 1 in 7 U.S. residents was born in a foreign country. In eight years time, the foreign born share of the U.S. population will reach an all-time high. If Silicon Valley’s lobbying efforts prove successful, that record will be shattered with even greater force and rapidity.



Posted in America, Immigration | Comments Off on Mark Zuckerberg Warns Iowa Ahead of Vote to Reject Trump

Forward: Iowa Caucuses Cap Harsh Campaign Dominated by Christian Appeals

Nathan Guttman writes:

Mixing religion and politics has, traditionally, been a source of concern for Jewish voters.
“It’s a slippery slope and there are concerns about how much religion is being talks,” said David Adelman, the Des Moines Jewish federation’s top lay leader. “That being said, obviously religion helps shape somebody’s moral direction and if that’s important to people everyone has the ability to ask these questions and vote based on whatever is important for them.”
Perhaps not surprisingly, the candidate least likely to discuss faith in his campaign is the only Jew in the rasie. Democrat Bernie Sanders avoids touching faith issues as much as possible. When asked by voters at a Jewish federation event last fall on the impact of his religion on his politics, Sanders stuck to the notion of “tikkun olam,” or repairing the world, and refused to delve any deeper into his own beliefs.

Israel is a nation-state based on a religion — Judaism, so I don’t think Jews intrinsically have a problem mixing politics with religion. They only have a problem when the mixing is to their disadvantage.

Rob Eshman in the Jewish Journal of Los Angeles writes about Hillary’s foreign policy wonk who apparently gets her values from the Jewish religion:

Rosenberger is 35, friendly, direct and familiar, the voice of someone you went to camp with, but probably smarter.
She describes herself as a wonk with a social-activist bent, which she credits to her religious background.
“So if you look at foreign policy,” said Rosenberger, who, like most millennials, is prone to start her most important sentences with “So,” “many different issues have inequality sort of at their core. And I would say that, for me, actually, I do think that comes from my Jewish roots. Passover is my favorite holiday, because I find very much a driving mission for myself in this, the obligation of the Jewish people who have been free from oppression ourselves to root out oppression wherever we see it.”
Rosenberger grew up in the South Hills suburbs of Pittsburgh, where her mother helped found the Jewish Community Center. The family belonged to the Reform movement: Temple Emanuel, travel to Israel with Young Judea, and summer each year at Emma Kaufmann Camp.

It does not sound like Laura Rosenberger has a big problem mixing politics with religion.

I think social identity theory best explains what is going on here. The more you identify with your in-group, the more suspicion you are likely to feel towards out-groups.



Posted in Christianity, Jews | Comments Off on Forward: Iowa Caucuses Cap Harsh Campaign Dominated by Christian Appeals

Marty Kaplan: The idiocy of the Iowa caucuses

Marty Kaplan writes: “We’re suckers for the patriotic mythology and gauzy imagery of town halls and high school gyms where candidates get grilled and caucus-goers speak up and get counted. But the power of Iowa and New Hampshire isn’t a reward for the superior candidate-scrutinizing skills that their citizens inherently possess; it’s a consequence of state party officials flexing their muscles over the calendar.”

Ever get the sense this guy just doesn’t like America, particularly middle America? Jews like Marty Kaplan fear populism and nativism and nationalism. They prefer government by elites.

Ever notice that elites tend to think America works much better than ordinary people think? Because the game is rigged against the ordinary hard-working America who doesn’t want welfare and doesn’t want more immigration.



Posted in Nationalism | Comments Off on Marty Kaplan: The idiocy of the Iowa caucuses

Immersing Yourself In An Alien Culture

Huffpo 2012: People can marry into different cultures, convert religions & immerse themselves in new ways of life -but what happens to someone’s identity when you embrace a new you?



Posted in Conversion | Comments Off on Immersing Yourself In An Alien Culture

Jewish Organizations Demand Muslim Immigrants Be Taught Democracy

New Observer Online:

The official representative of the American Jewish Committee (AJC) in Berlin has demanded that the flood of Arab invaders pouring into Europe must be taught to be “democratic”—i.e. not anti-Semitic—highlighting the Jewish lobby’s blatant hypocrisy in supporting the nonwhite invasion of Europe while refusing to let any of these “refugees” enter Israel.


The American Jewish Committee Berlin’s statement, featuring a photograph of a wall of an invader center, upon which a crude swastika and a Star of David with “666”–the alleged sign of the devil–have been scrawled. Of course, the chances of this being genuine are tiny, mainly because Muslims would not know about the “666” reference, which is exclusively a popular culture Christian turn of phrase.

Without considering the blatancy of their hypocrisy, the AJC in Berlin announced that it was organizing a “summit to outline educational priorities for half a million new asylum seekers” in Germany.


The report, originally made by the Jewish Telegraphic Agency (JTA) and then repeated in the Times of Israel, said “amid fears that Muslim refugees’ arrival to Germany may cause problems for local Jews,” that the American Jewish Committee in Berlin called for a national summit on ways to combat “anti-democratic values” among the newcomers.

By “anti-democratic values,” they of course mean hostility toward Jews and Israel—which, thanks to Israel’s murderous campaign of ethnic cleansing against the Palestinians, is common among the entire Muslim world.

“It is five minutes before midnight, but not yet too late,” AJC Berlin director Deidre Berger was quoted as saying.

The report went on to admit that the Muslim immigrants are “responsible for most [of the] violent anti-Semitic incidents today, as well as increases in attacks,”—something which they and the controlled media have always generally tried to hide or blame on European “neo-Nazis.”

According to the report, Berger’s words echo the concerns of Josef Schuster, head of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, who has asked for reassurances that Chancellor Angela Merkel would “take Jewish concerns seriously.”

The report also openly admits that despite the obvious hostility toward Jews which the Muslim invasion brings, all the Jewish organizations have nonetheless supported the influx:

Leaders of Jewish communities in Hungary, Austria, the Netherlands, and Belgium, among other places, expressed similar concerns while insisting — as has Schuster — they favored magnanimous treatment of refugees.

This echoes a September 2015 article in the JTA, titled “European Jews, mindful of risks, urge aid to refugees,” which told of several instances of Jews pushing for aid for the invading nonwhite hordes even though they were well aware that many of the incoming Arabs were “anti-Semitic.”

The JTA quoted Ron van der Wieken, chairman of the Central Jewish Organization of the Netherlands, as saying that while he was “aware that some Middle Eastern refugees harbor very negative feelings toward Jews … Jews cannot withdraw support from those in need and fleeing serious violence,” and urged Holland to devise a “charitable” refugee policy.

Zoltan Radnoti, the newly elected chairman of the rabbinical board of the Mazsihisz umbrella group of Hungarian Jewish communities, was then quoted as saying, “I help the refugees with fear that I am helping send danger to other Jews in Europe. I know some of the refugees may have fired on our [Israeli] soldiers. Others would have done so in a heartbeat. I know. But I am duty bound to help.”


The World Jewish Congress and the Central Council of Jews in Germany have also gone on record as welcoming the mainly Muslim nonwhite invasion of Europe.

In a formal statement published in Die Welt newspaper in Germany, titled “Wir Juden wissen, wie bitter Flucht ist” (“We Jews Understand What Being a Refugee Means”), Ronald S. Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress (WJC) and Dr. Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany and a vice-president of the WJC, attacked all Germans who oppose the flooding of their country by nonwhites, calling them “neo-Nazis.”

For many years, there were complaints about the country’s [Germany’s] unwillingness to become a country of immigration, and about a lack of a ‘culture of welcome.’ Given what we saw over the last weeks, that’s obviously not the case at all. The Jewish community, both in Germany and worldwide, welcomes this evolution toward an open society. It is the right thing.

The two top Jews then went on to demand that the flood of nonwhite invaders be distributed to all European nations:

What is needed now is not only a just allocation to the various countries, but also longer-term support. Winter is around the country, and the refugees need good housing. It won’t suffice to provide them with tents, or pretzels, or teddy bears.


The World Jewish Congress went on to state that “closing Europe’s borders is not the right answer to the refugee crisis.” This was said in an official statement penned by its Deputy CEO for Diplomacy, Maram Stern, in September 2015.

The WJC statement said that it would be “immoral” for Europe to close the borders, and that “Europe needs to act now. Our answer can’t be to close the doors. Not only would it not work, it would be immoral.”


At the same time, however, the Jewish state of Israel—which all these Jewish organization support—has been adamant that it will not allow a single “refugee” to enter its territory.

As reported in the LA Times of September 6, 2015 (“One country that won’t be taking Syrian refugees: Israel”), Israel has absolutely refused to accept a single “refugee”—despite all Jewish organizations in Europe and America being at the forefront of pushing these “refugees” into Europe.


An official statement from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office emphatically stated that Israel’s “lack of demographic and geographic depth” required controlling its borders against both “illegal migrants and terrorism.”


In fact, Israel has also made it illegal for any non-Jew, as racially defined by that state, to immigrate to Israel at all, no matter where they come from.


At the same time, the Israeli government has also financed, through its official foreign aid section (IsraAID), the Third World Muslim invasion of Europe.

According to the IsraAID website, that agency’s “work” in Europe includes an “Advanced Emergency Team” on the ground providing basic medical and psychosocial support to refugees, as well as distributing “much needed emergency items, including baby slings.”

In addition, the IsraAID website says, the Jews have “sent an assessment and relief mission to Serbia and Croatia to determine both the short-term and long-term needs of the refugee population crossing through Europe” and has launched a “Mobile Relief Unit in anticipation of Hungary’s stricter border controls.”


The Jewish hypocrisy could not be clearer: on the one hand, they refuse to let any of these “refugees” into Israel, arguing, quite correctly, that letting in millions of these Muslims will destroy Israel’s racial homogeneity and stability.

However, on the other hand, these same Jews—in Israel and elsewhere—ardently support the importation of millions of Muslim “refugees” into Europe—knowing very well that they will destroy Europe’s racial homogeneity and stability.

Now, as western Europe teeters on the brink, these same Jewish organizations which promoted and pushed the nonwhite invasion, are now demanding that the Muslims pouring into Europe be “educated” into not being “anti-Semitic.”



Posted in Germany, Immigration, Islam | Comments Off on Jewish Organizations Demand Muslim Immigrants Be Taught Democracy

Dutch Police Crack Down On Immigration Skeptics

New Observer Online:

Dutch police are being sent to threaten white people who dared send out mildly-critical social media messages about the “refugee” invasion on the grounds that they are being “seditious”—while at the same time, they mollycoddle nonwhite invader criminals who riot and attack policemen.


According to a report in the Dutch NRC newspaper, Dutch people on Twitter who oppose invader camps in that country “can expect a visit from the police.”

At the same time, a report in the Telegraaf newspaper revealed that dozens of “asylum seekers” in Zaandaam had violently attacked police and medical personnel sent in to help them—but no one was even charged in connection with that physical violence.

The NRC article told of a visit by Dutch police last Monday afternoon to the workplace of 28-year-old Mark Jongeneel, in the town of Sliedrecht. After causing an uproar in the office, the two policemen told him, “You tweet too much. We have orders to ask you to watch your tone. Your tweets are seditious.”

The police visit to Jongeneel followed a tweet he had made just prior to a public meeting in the town on a planned invader center in the area. His “crime” was to tweet: “The Council of #Sliedrecht comes with a proposal to take 250 refugees over the next two years. What a bad idea!”

He later tweeted “Should we let this happen?!”

This was obviously an important police matter, and two of Holland’s finest were dispatched to threaten Jongeneel for these “crimes,” leading even the leftist NRC to ask of the police harassment: “Is this even legal?”

The NRC went on to report that this tactic of police threats against whites who oppose the invasion has been carrying on for several months. “In recent months, police have visited the homes of many more people who criticized the plans for asylum centers.”

According to the NRC, about twenty opponents of the invader center in Leeuwarden received police visits in October 2015. The same pattern was repeated in Enschede, and in some places in the Brabant, where whites had opened a Facebook page opposing the invasion. In that latter case, the police issued orders to close down the page.

The NRC quoted a spokesman for the national police as admitting that they have ten intelligence units of “digital detectives” who do nothing else except monitor Facebook pages and Twitter accounts in real time, looking for posts that go too far.”

A spokesman for the municipality Sliedrecht explained to the NRC that it had called the police in on Jongeneel because they wanted to ensure that any planned demonstration first be cleared with the local authority—although there was no indication in his tweets that he was planning such a thing.

“It’s not like we live in a police state,” the municipality spokesman told the NRC, obviously trying to ward off the next obvious question.

The NRC article then interviewed a number of other Dutch people who had also been subjected to harassment by Holland’s “digital detectives,” including mechanic Johan Van Wouw (43) who had dared to say on his Facebook page regarding an invader center being planned by his town council: “Let these leaders go to hell; we are all going to the town.”

In due course, the “digital detectives” arrived at his door, accusing him of inciting a demonstration.

“The visit lasted about twenty minutes and the police behaved in a very authoritarian manner,” Van Wouw told the NRC. “I feel like my freedom has been restricted. If I now post something on Facebook, I realize that the police will be reading it.”

Another victim of the police’s anti-white campaign, quoted by the NRC, was Kim (33) from Kaatsheuvel, who asked, “Why can we not we say what we think?”

After a visit from the “digital detectives,” she said that the “municipality is making so much effort to make sure that we keep our mouths shut. What does that mean? We think we know the answer: it means we citizens are not taken seriously.”

The NRC left the last word to Mark Jongeneel: “After the police’s visit, I have decided to clearly speak out; I will not let myself be silenced.”


The “no-tolerance” policy being enforced against white dissenters contrasts dramatically with the police’s behavior in Zaandaam last night.

According to the Telegraaf report, “Dozens of residents of the refugee center in Zaandam fought with paramedics and police” who had been sent to assist after an invader apparently tried to commit suicide.

The violence started after a Dutch ambulance crew was called because an invader had injured himself with a large knife. The medics wanted to bring the man to the ambulance parked outside to treat him, but the other nonwhite invaders wanted to carry the man themselves. When the medics warned that this might injure him further, the nonwhites got violent and attacked the whites.

The medics retreated and called the police, who then had a fifteen minute struggle to bring the mini-riot under control.

Even then, only one nonwhite was arrested, but then immediately released—in obvious contrast to the treatment that the police are giving to white Dutch people who dare even suggest that they don’t agree with the nonwhite invasion.

The shocking police action—given that the government has just admitted that there are thousands of criminal acts being carried out by the recently-arrived and already established nonwhites in that country—shows definitively that the establishment is far more concerned about white reaction to the invasion, than the ongoing criminal rampages and identity fraud being perpetrated by the invaders.



Posted in Censorship, Holland, Immigration | Comments Off on Dutch Police Crack Down On Immigration Skeptics

Dutch Political Police Repress Internet Immivasion Dissent

Holland used to have free speech.

From VDARE: H/T our correspondent in Occupied Europe, Friedrich Zauner, who sent us last Tuesday “You tweet too much” about refugees, the Dutch are told by police By Dan Alexe New Europe January 26 2016

Dutch police have been visiting the homes of people critical of asylum centres on Twitter, urging them to delete posts…

It was…in the town of Sliedrecht, that Mark Jongeneel (28) got a very disturbing phone call. His mother was on the line, worried that two policemen were looking for him, but would not say why. …the police came to his office and told him: “You tweet too much. We have orders to ask you to watch your tone. Your tweets may seem seditious.

In Sliedrecht there had been a citizen meeting about a refugee center in the region. At the end, Jongeneel had posted a few tweets. One said: “The College of #Sliedrecht comes with a proposal to take 250 refugees over the next two years. What a bad idea! “Earlier he had also tweeted:” Should we let this happen?!

In recent months, police have visited the homes of many more people that criticised the plans for asylum centres.

I am ashamed to say that Peter Brimelow promptly asked me to blog on this. But the pressures of having to earn a living delayed me as a result of which we were scooped by the invaluable webzine The New Observer: Dutch Police Threaten Whites January 31, 2016. Their remarkable language resources enabled them to derive some more crucial details from the source report U twittert wel heel veel, zei de politie Kim Bos Martin Kuiper 20 januari 2016

According to the NRC, about twenty opponents of the invader center in Leeuwarden received police visits in October 2015. The same pattern was repeated in Enschede, and in some places in the Brabant, where whites had opened a Facebook page opposing the invasion. In that latter case, the police issued orders to close down the page.

( emphasis)

The NRC quoted a spokesman for the national police as admitting that they have ten intelligence units of “digital detectives” who do nothing else except monitor Facebook pages and Twitter accounts in real time, looking for posts that go too far.”

The New Observer helpfully adds

The “no-tolerance” policy being enforced against white dissenters contrasts dramatically with the police’s behavior in Zaandaam last night.

According to the Telegraaf report, “Dozens of residents of the refugee center in Zaandam fought with paramedics and police”…the police…had a fifteen minute struggle to bring the mini-riot under control.

Even then, only one nonwhite was arrested, but then immediately released—in obvious contrast to the treatment that the police are giving to white Dutch people who dare even suggest that they don’t agree with the nonwhite invasion.

As James Kirkpatrick observed this morning

2016 is going to be a year of repression as the Left moves to simply prohibit discussion of the problems it has created.

A new Iron Curtain is descending on Europe. The other side won the Cold War, and is now curtailing freedoms with Political Police. Ironically one of the great scholars of the post 1945 clampdown has already questioned the new pretext: Reality Dawns: NeoCon Princess Wonders About Young Muslim Immigrants.

This is coming to America as soon as the Commissar Kagans dominate the Supreme Court.



Posted in Holland, Immigration | Comments Off on Dutch Political Police Repress Internet Immivasion Dissent

EXCLUSIVE: Pollster Frank Luntz Helped Shape Marco Rubio’s Entire Political Career, Did Not Disclose Relationship on Fox News

From Breitbart: Pollster Frank Luntz has been instrumental in shaping the political career of young Sen. Marco Rubio, raising grave concerns about Fox News’ decision not to disclose that relationship before Luntz showcased an extraordinarily pro-Rubio focus-group after Thursday night’s Republican debate.

Breitbart News has learned from a high-level former elected Florida Republican that Luntz crafted Rubio’s messaging efforts when he was a rising state legislator in the Sunshine State a decade ago.

Luntz was paid to guide Rubio’s transition into a statewide political role and he even helped to fashion the famous “American Exceptionalism” speech that vaulted Rubio to national prominence, spending much face-time with the young lawmaker in the process.

Luntz took up a block of time on Fox News immediately after the debate Thursday night to show how his hand-picked focus-group declared Rubio the winner of the Donald Trump-free debate.

Luntz’s post-debate focus group was so skewed in favor of Rubio it was jarring.

“Megyn, you asked probably the toughest question of the debate. You gave the candidates no room to wiggle. You pressed him. And he responded,” Luntz gushed to Megyn Kelly, awkwardly referring only to Rubio before even mentioning him by name. “I want to begin with the most important and impactful moment of this debate. It was your challenge of Marco Rubio. And watch how well he did on immigration.”



Posted in Fox | Comments Off on EXCLUSIVE: Pollster Frank Luntz Helped Shape Marco Rubio’s Entire Political Career, Did Not Disclose Relationship on Fox News