I was having lunch February 26 with National Review writer Matt Scully
(author of Dominion:
The Power of Man, the Suffering of Animals, and the Call to Mercy),
who's friendly with and admiring of columnist Joseph Sobran. Sculley described
what a Shakespeare scholar Sobran is. That Joseph is a wonderful and warm
"In the warmest of hearts," I recited to my friend Cathy Seipp,
"there is often a cold spot for the Jew."
I argued that Sobran hated Jews. Matt argued back. He said Sobran's response
to Bill Buckley (in Bill's book In
Search of Anti-Semitism) showed Joseph to be a good and reasonable
On February 29, I emailed Sobran to discuss these matters. He did not
answer my email.
Obsessed With Jews
He’s the columnist who complained that "Hitler died in 1945, but anti-Hitler
hysteria is still going strong"; cautioned against "the excessive moral
prestige Jews have in the media and the public square"; whined about
"Jews deciding the standards, setting the criteria of humanity"; and
observed, in chilling if artful prose, that because Jews "set themselves
up as the arbiter, there is, if you’ll pardon the expression, a certain
‘kill the umpire’ impulse."
He’s the writer who decried, in a column following the release of "Schindler’s
List," what he called "all this Holocaust-harping" and characterized
Nazi genocide as basically a German overreaction to the crimes of "Jewish-led
communist movements." And he’s the commentator who warned that "History
is replete with the lesson that a country in which the Jews get the
upper hand is in danger. Such was the experience of Europe during Jewish-led
Communist revolutions in Russia, Hungary, Romania and Germany."
No, he’s not Patrick Buchanan, he’s Buchanan’s ideological soulmate,
Joseph Sobran, a talented writer who in the mid-1980’s descended into
the fever swamp of anti-Semitic polemics and hasn’t emerged since.
Though Sobran’s work is now mainly relegated to the Internet, he’s
had a remarkably mainstream career, not only as a syndicated columnist
but as a regular commentator, from 1979 to 1991, on the CBS radio network’s
"Spectrum" series and as a senior editor at National Review for nearly
Sobran’s relentlessly negative focus on Jews and Israel led former
National Review editor William F. Buckley, in the magazine’s July 4,
1986 issue, to publish an editorial distancing himself from his employee
and acknowledging that "any person" who’d read a recent series of Sobran’s
newspaper columns "might reasonably conclude that those columns were
written by a writer inclined to anti-Semitism." (Sobran inexplicably
managed to retain his title of senior editor at the magazine until 1990
when Buckley finally asked him to step down.)
Sobran was invited to address the Holocaust revisionist Institute for
Historical Review in 2002. Among the lowlights of his speech: "Why on
earth is it ‘anti-Jewish’ to conclude from the evidence that the standard
numbers of Jews murdered are inaccurate, or that the Hitler regime,
bad as it was in many ways, was not, in fact, intent on racial extermination?….
I lack the scholarly competence to be [a Holocaust denier]. I don’t
read German, so I can’t assess the documentary evidence; I don’t know
chemistry, so I can’t discuss Zyklon-B…. Of course, those who affirm
the Holocaust need know nothing about the German language, chemistry,
and other pertinent subjects; they need only repeat what they have been
told by the authorities … the Holocaust has become a device for exempting
Jews from normal human obligations. It has authorized them to bully
and blackmail, to extort and oppress…."
Sobran becomes annoyed no end whenever anyone dares mention the historical
role of the Catholic Church in the persecution of Jews. His reaction
to Pope John Paul II’s conciliatory remarks on his visit to Israel in
2000 was to ask, "Where is the corresponding statement of Jewish leaders
repudiating and repenting the Jewish role in a cause whose crimes dwarf
those of Hitler? Did major Jewish spokesmen or organizations condemn
Communism as it devoured tens of millions of Christians?... Even today,
how many Jews condemn Franklin Roosevelt for his fondness for Stalin,
as they would condemn him if he had shown the slightest partiality toward
It should go without saying that a fantasist of Sobran’s ilk views
Israel in much the same negative light as he does "major Jewish spokesmen"
and what he’s termed the "anti-Christian" Jewish establishment.
"Israel," Sobran has written, "exemplifies most of the ‘anti-Semitic
stereotypes’ of yore: it is exclusivist, belligerent, parasitic, amoral
and underhanded. It feels no obligation to non-Jews, even those who
have befriended it."
And, in a column in which he condemned the "relentless pro-Israel propaganda"
of non-Jews like Jeane Kirkpatrick and George Will, Sobran complained
that it was due to the enormous power of the American Jewish establishment
that "Israel’s journalistic partisans include so many gentiles – lapsed
goyim, you might say."
Should it come as a surprise that Pat Buchanan has called Sobran "perhaps
the finest columnist of our generation"?
Jason Maoz can be reached at email@example.com
[Joseph] Sobran and I actually exchanged several e-mails about three
years ago, and he came across as funny, sensible, and downright nice.
It's almost like a different person writes his columns. The human mind
is a wonderment. I actually caught your stuff on Sobran a few days ago
because I'd been too busy to read your Jeffrey
Hart interview when it first appeared.
Not enough has been written about what I would describe as William
Buckley's seemingly ambivalent attitude toward Jews. Yes, he basically
read the Birchers out of mainstream conservatism in the 60's, but he
did it almost reluctantly and after a great deal of prodding by the
ADL. (Besides, the Birch Society was never an anti-Semitic or anti-Israel
organization per se, although it did draw its share of anti-Semitic
members. But Buckley was more concerned about the Birchers' overall
kooky, paranoid image and how that image affected the media's portrayal
of all conservatives.)
His reaction to Sobran was also frustratingly slow and muted, as was
his response to Pat Buchanan. Even Buckley's celebrated statement in
1991 about Buchanan's anti-Semitism (which originated as a special issue
of NR and evolved into a slim book a few months later) was not nearly
the unambiguous condemnation some made it out to be. In fact, the following
year NR endorsed(!) Pat Buchanan in the Republican primaries over Bush
the First -- and Buckley was still very much running the show at the
time. Buckley's statements on Israel over the decades have been inconsistent
at best, and it's notable that NR has taken a much more staunchly pro-Israel
line in the years since Buckley relinquished his day-to-day control.